Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 04:12 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
It is the daemon that drives the speech bubbles that are shown in the
notification area on the gnome-panel. Christian explains:
notification-daemon *requires* libsexy. It can't be made an optional
dependency, as SexyUrlLabel,
Hi everyone.
Deja vu. I guess I'll give the usual response to this thread :)
I had a blog entry a while back addressing exactly why I didn't want
projects to do this. libsexy is not libegg and I'm not wild about having to
maintain two copies of the widget.
libsexy is at this point bundled on
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:51:22AM -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
I would love to get libsexy's widgets bundled into GTK+, but that will
require some extensions to widgets such as GtkEntry and GtkLabel to allow
subclasses to better hook into the PangoLayouts of the widgets (by providing
a
On 31/07/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This server is a test instance so we can eat our own dogfood, and any
data on it may be nuked, accidentally leaked due to bugs in the code,
etc. Generally we deploy to dogfood straight from SVN latest with no
testing. Please adjust your
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 16:38 -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote:
GNOME is going to have to become a service provider.
as far as I see it, GNOME is already a (small though) service provider
for online storing. That is, we have art.gnome.org for themes/icons, we
have devel.gnome.org for devel docs,
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 17:48 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
The bleeding edge server code is now up at:
http://dogfood-online.gnome.org:9080/
And the old skin:
http://dogfood.mugshot.org:9080/
I can't create an account on neither of them. The first one's 'Send'
button
2007/8/1, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 16:38 -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote:
GNOME is going to have to become a service provider.
as far as I see it, GNOME is already a (small though) service provider
for online storing. That is, we have art.gnome.org for
Hi,
Sanford Armstrong wrote:
How does this fit into the grand scheme of the online desktop? Tomboy
can't be the only app that wants to store real data (not just
configuration data) out there. I know Mugshot is meant mostly to bind
existing services together, but how is a small free software
Hi,
Thomas Thurman wrote:
Is there a way to get an account on a test instance such as this one,
for hacking on the Mugshot server?
Not yet. The main practical problem right now is that the test instance
is on the same machine as the real instance, which means if we gave you
an account you
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
as far as I see it, GNOME is already a (small though) service provider
for online storing. That is, we have art.gnome.org for themes/icons, we
have devel.gnome.org for devel docs, svn.gnome.org for code, etc
So, the first thing that comes to my mind with this online
Hi,
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Basically, a new art.gnome.org http://art.gnome.org web site is going
on (AGO3), as a SoC project. If I have some time, I would we've been
working on an atom extension for themes on the current a.g.o. web, and I
did a small app to consume those feeds[0].
In
Hi,
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
I can't create an account on neither of them. The first one's 'Send'
button for obtaining a sign up link does nothing, and the second one
just told me I'll be contacted once there's room for me :-(
I forgot to include one of the javascript files, and then Owen started
2007/8/1, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Basically, a new art.gnome.org http://art.gnome.org web site is going
on (AGO3), as a SoC project. If I have some time, I would we've been
working on an atom extension for themes on the current a.g.o. web, and I
did
On 8/1/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sanford Armstrong wrote:
How does this fit into the grand scheme of the online desktop? Tomboy
can't be the only app that wants to store real data (not just
configuration data) out there. I know Mugshot is meant mostly to bind
Hi,
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Errr... have you seen the link at the bottom of my previous e-mail?
Anyway, direct link to the screencast:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=reB9TNRQ1Bg
Cool!
Havoc
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On 8/2/07, Sanford Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sanford Armstrong wrote:
How does this fit into the grand scheme of the online desktop? Tomboy
can't be the only app that wants to store real data (not just
configuration
On 8/1/07, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime, I'll ask the same question as I did before. Can we just
consider libsexy or notification-daemon a blessed dependency given how
widespread they both are these days?
+1 from me. It's so widespread already that the
Just in case anyone is thinking of the same issues.
A lot of discussion is going on along the lines of getting a user's
desktop unbound from a physical computer, and letting the user peruse
his/her settings, data from all over.
One issue is that of passwords and (private) encryption keys. It
18 matches
Mail list logo
