Re: MAINTAINERS in svn -- have it or don't get any SVN account approved

2007-08-07 Thread Thomas Thurman
Thomas Thurman to Bastien show details 23:15 (0 minutes ago) On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:36 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > 2. The content resembles the following: > > Some Name > E-mail: some email-address invalid > Userid: svn-account-name 1. "Some Name" is their legal name

Re: MAINTAINERS in svn -- have it or don't get any SVN account approved

2007-08-07 Thread Sven Herzberg
Olav Vitters wrote: > Note: Modules without such a file will be ignored (people cannot > request SVN accounts for such modules). > > So in short: > 1. Please ensure the following file exists in your SVN repos: >/trunk/MAINTAINERS (no other place is ok) > 2. The content resembles the following:

Re: MAINTAINERS in svn -- have it or don't get any SVN account approved

2007-08-07 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:36 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > Some Name > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Userid: svn-account-name > > > Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the > E-mail address is the one your @svn.g.o alias forwards to. Can you make it understand [EMAIL P

Re: MAINTAINERS in svn -- have it or don't get any SVN account approved

2007-08-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey Olav, On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:36 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > Please read if you are the maintainer of a module in svn.gnome.org: > > The new accounts system will store maintainer information in LDAP. > Meaning, it'll know who the maintainers are for some module. People will > not be able to

Re: Online Desktop, Tomboy, and user storage

2007-08-07 Thread john . carr
Hi Guys I'm one of the Conduit developers and I'd just like to get your feelings on where Conduit and/or OpenSync fit in to this. I understand that you guys are heading the charge on this, but especially wanted to draw your attention to Conduit. We are one of a handful of projects that have b

Re: DataModel.cs

2007-08-07 Thread BJörn Lindqvist
On 8/7/07, Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > To get started on Tomboy I wrote DataModel.cs, which exposes the "Online > Desktop Engine" data model to C#. When you're done laughing at my C# > incompetence this is maybe a useful illustration of how the data model > works. The pro

DataModel.cs

2007-08-07 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, To get started on Tomboy I wrote DataModel.cs, which exposes the "Online Desktop Engine" data model to C#. When you're done laughing at my C# incompetence this is maybe a useful illustration of how the data model works. Owen gives more background at http://fishsoup.net/blog/2007/07/24/#1

Re: Online Desktop, Tomboy, and user storage

2007-08-07 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, Sanford Armstrong wrote: > Sync and Publish as distinct features concerns me; we don't want too > many ways to do the same thing. Maybe if Publish were equivalent to > "mark this note public, sync if necessary"... I agree here. > I think this is a good idea, assuming it can be ready fairly

Re: GNOME online desktop - (some of the possible) next steps

2007-08-07 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > Hi, > > Some thoughts on near-term goals and steps to get things rolling (for > those who want to play): > ... I miss the 'shared storage' thing in your list, like moving the themes/icons/backgrounds from art.gnome.org to be part of

Re: GNOME online desktop - (some of the possible) next steps

2007-08-07 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > - the application-install stuff at http://mugshot.org/applications > needs a bit of work to support non-Fedora distributions; it's > written to allow that, but we really need volunteers to add Ubuntu > etc. > can you jus

Re: GNOME online desktop - (some of the possible) next steps

2007-08-07 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On 7/24/07, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 15:10 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > > > - sync of browser state (history, bookmarks, cookies, passwords), > > like Google Browser Sync but open source and integrated with > > everything else (e.g. no n

Re: Updating the icon cache (GNOME Goals)

2007-08-07 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw this http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AppIcon about making > apps update the GTK+ icon cache during "make install". > > This would be fine in a tarball-only world, but I wonder if distros will > just end up patching out that part of Makefiles, an