Re: Low memory hacks

2008-03-03 Thread Brian Nitz
Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:32 +, Brian Nitz wrote: For example, launching eog in the C locale (Solaris Nevada build 82, GNOME 2.20.2) opens font files for many other locales. These may be mapped into physical memory at times, regardless of your locale. :

GIO backend for GtkFileChooser

2008-03-03 Thread Luca Ferretti
From libgnome: #: ../schemas/desktop_gnome_interface.schemas.in.in.h:22 msgid Module to use as the filesystem model for the GtkFileChooser widget. Possible values are \gnome-vfs\ and \gtk+\. Issues: * Now we allow gio as possible value, we should break the string freeze *

Re: help sanity check the release notes

2008-03-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 02 mars 2008, à 10:27 +0900, Davyd Madeley a écrit : It's not my best work, but I think that the text is probably ready to sign off on so that the translators can make a start on it. Release team? Some comments by Olav (he's at work right now, so I'm his slave sending his mails):

Re: HTML Widgets a11y (was Re: GSOC 2008 advice)

2008-03-03 Thread David Bolter
Hi Shaun, A quick note about WebKit and ARIA inline below: Shaun McCance wrote: On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:40 -0500, Willie Walker wrote: I'm retitling this because I was just deleting GSOC mail -- my inbox is flooding and I needed to do some drastic filtering. Many thanks to Behdad for

Re: PyGIO?

2008-03-03 Thread Johan Dahlin
Matteo Settenvini wrote: Hi everybody, does anyone have any news on some PyGIO bindings? They should complement the PyGtk and PyGObject stack, but googling for it didn't bring up any result. There's the beginning of python bindings for GIO in PyGObject SVN (trunk), but be aware as they

Re: communication/information between forward-looking projects [was Re: Some info (Ref: GSOC 2008 advice)]

2008-03-03 Thread Luis Villa
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:35 AM, natan yellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all, I'd just like to point out that I've only been using Linux for about eight months. If anything I say is incorrect, corrections are more than welcome. On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Luis Villa [EMAIL

Re: communication/information between forward-looking projects [was Re: Some info (Ref: GSOC 2008 advice)]

2008-03-03 Thread Dave Neary
Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:50 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: Second, if there is any one thing which is agreed on, I think it would be less 'no GNOME 3.0' and more 'no 3.0 for the sake of 3.0'. In other words, if someone can come up with something that truly improves the

Re: Low memory hacks

2008-03-03 Thread Pat Suwalski
Brian Nitz wrote: Third, there's no such thing as locale-specific fonts. If a font happens to cover Chinese only, so be it. Finally, if you don't need those fonts, simply don't install them (or uninstall them). I know it doesn't make sense from a developer's point of view, but it

Re: communication/information between forward-looking projects [was Re: Some info (Ref: GSOC 2008 advice)]

2008-03-03 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:14 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: The first step in releasing GNOME 3.0 is to dissociate the in-built assumption will break everything from the version jump. Sure, we can go from GNOME 2.22 this cycle straight to GNOME 24 the next one. What does *that* buy us? That is,

Re: communication/information between forward-looking projects [was Re: Some info (Ref: GSOC 2008 advice)]

2008-03-03 Thread Brian Cameron
Dave/Behdad: Dave Neary wrote: Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:14 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: The first step in releasing GNOME 3.0 is to dissociate the in-built assumption will break everything from the version jump. Sure, we can go from GNOME 2.22 this cycle straight to GNOME

Totem branched for 2.22

2008-03-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
SSIA Plans include: - Finishing the DVB support (including scanner UI) - Fast-forward support ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: communication/information between forward-looking projects [was Re: Some info (Ref: GSOC 2008 advice)]

2008-03-03 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Brian Cameron wrote: Quoting myself: Many users think major version bump is synonymous with significant new features. Many is a fuzzy word. How many is many? Deliberately fuzzy... I avoided most people or most people I know, although I believe both would be true. Whether a user