Hi,
I was looking at this bug [1] since it affects me using combining
characters in vim when I'm using the terminal. Before I look more
into this I have a few questions:
1. Will this be fixed soon?
2. If not what would be the preferable solution to fixing this? And
how could I help fix
I would like to propose PolicyKit[1] as an external dep for 2.26 - it's
mostly API stable[2], and is now being used as an optional dep in many
modules in gnome svn and HAL.
I would like to depend on it for gnome-power-manager, and I hate all the
#ifdefs. Does anybody have any problems with
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose PolicyKit[1] as an external dep for 2.26 - it's
mostly API stable[2], and is now being used as an optional dep in many
modules in gnome svn and HAL.
I would like to depend on it for
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:23 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose PolicyKit[1] as an external dep for 2.26 - it's
mostly API stable[2], and is now being used as an optional dep in many
modules in
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Matthias Clasen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, the patches are using PolicyKit-gnome, too. If we allow
dependencies on PolicyKit, we should allow PolicyKit-gnome, too, since
it makes it very easy to write UIs that trigger privileged operations
and handle
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Matthias Clasen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, the patches are using PolicyKit-gnome, too. If we allow
dependencies on PolicyKit, we should allow PolicyKit-gnome, too, since
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 17:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
s/2.26/2.24/ I guess? :-)
I figured I was too late for 2.24 - if not, even better.
Richard.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 17:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 07 mai 2008, à 16:18 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :
I would like to propose PolicyKit[1] as an external dep for 2.26 - it's
mostly API stable[2], and is now being used as an optional dep in many
modules in gnome svn and
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 17:29 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:23 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose PolicyKit[1] as an external dep for 2.26 - it's
mostly API stable[2], and
I would like to propose PolicyKit[1] as an external dep for 2.26 - it's
mostly API stable[2], and is now being used as an optional dep in many
modules in gnome svn and HAL.
I would like to depend on it for gnome-power-manager, and I hate all the
#ifdefs. Does anybody have any problems
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I do not think it is a problem for PolicyKit to be an external
dependency for GNOME. However, there will probably be people at Sun
working to #ifdef out PolicyKit code in the modules that tend to get
shipped with
Jason:
If Sun wants to do something completely different from what the rest of
the community is doing, it seems like the responsibility for bearing the
consequences of that course of action should lay squarely on the
shoulders of Sun's engineering teams.
Understood. I was not really
12 matches
Mail list logo
