On Wed, May 06, 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I just have these lines in my ~/.emacs:
(autoload 'nuke-trailing-whitespace nuke-trailing-whitespace nil t)
(add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'nuke-trailing-whitespace)
This sounds like it would remove all trailing whitespace in any file
you touch;
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 11:18 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I just have these lines in my ~/.emacs:
(autoload 'nuke-trailing-whitespace nuke-trailing-whitespace nil t)
(add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'nuke-trailing-whitespace)
This sounds like it
Hi,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:13:07AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:33:59AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Imagine
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the
distributions will not loose their patches.
I think this summarize well the whole thing: we do
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the
distributions will not loose their
Hi,
Le lundi 04 mai 2009, à 14:50 +0300, Xan Lopez a écrit :
Hello,
the aim of the Epiphany team is to make 2.28 our first WebKit release.
For this to happen we need to replace our external dependency on Gecko
with WebKitGTK+, so consider this a request to do so.
In the post 2.26 module
Vincent Untz wrote:
Willie: do you have any idea when the a11y team would be able to give a
+1 for webkit? Being able to know it's okay as soon as possible would
definitely help us organize things.
I'm CC'ing Joanie, who'll be the person doing most of the work on the
assistive technology side
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 10:40 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 11:18 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I just have these lines in my ~/.emacs:
(autoload 'nuke-trailing-whitespace nuke-trailing-whitespace nil t)
(add-hook
Behdad Esfahbod schrieb:
On 05/05/2009 05:59 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Behdad Esfahbodbeh...@behdad.org
wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and
Hey Will, all.
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 09:58 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
Vincent Untz wrote:
Willie: do you have any idea when the a11y team would be able to give a
+1 for webkit? Being able to know it's okay as soon as possible would
definitely help us organize things.
I'm CC'ing Joanie,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Joanmarie Diggs
joanmarie.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now, my answer is gosh, I sure hope so. :-) Admittedly, not as
good as a heck yes!, but better than no.
Where things stand as of today is that WebKit needs quite a bit of work
to ready as far as a11y is
* It is good to see you have added support for specifying map uri's. I
would also like to see you support quadtree encoding, and
randomization of hosts. See osm-gps-map for what I mean...
I will have a look, but little code can be shared as osm-gps-map is
GPL :) but if the method is
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the
distributions will not loose
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
debian releases. If GNOME
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:26 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
Debian patches are debian patches, they
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:15 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Are you going to argue that this branch is desirable to keep alive for
all eternity?
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gedit/log/?h=CORBA_ENABLED
I think most reasonable people will say that there is a difference
between branches which were
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:15 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Are you going to argue that this branch is desirable to keep alive for
all eternity?
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gedit/log/?h=CORBA_ENABLED
I think most reasonable
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Germán Póo-Caamaño g...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:26 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Elijah Newren new...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any release, there
where commits after the last release. So my question here is: who
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you fight to keep alive the branch Linus just found too crappy
and just killed it? If a commit never made it to a release and
probably never would, is it really that important?
It seems to me whatever
Hi
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Les Harris lhar...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
The consensus so far seems to be that losing commits is a non-starter.
It's not clear to me what benefit dropping these ossified
Hi! Welcome to the end of the thread. It certainly has
been fun, but in order to conserve our precious electrons
in these hard economic times, we must regretfully now
close this thread.
As the kids say, you don't have to go home, but you can't
post here.
Thank you and good night.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Les Harris lhar...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you fight to keep alive the branch Linus just found too crappy
and just killed it? If a commit never made it to a release and
probably
Hi;
John Stowers wrote:
Unfortunately, the original TangoGPS author, [...], ignores any
emails from me, other osm-gps-map developers, or users, that request
permission to change the license of osm-gps-map to LGPL.
I guess the lesson here is to never create a library, derived from a
GPL
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Christian Persch c...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi;
John Stowers wrote:
Unfortunately, the original TangoGPS author, [...], ignores any
emails from me, other osm-gps-map developers, or users, that request
permission to change the license of osm-gps-map to LGPL.
I have to admit, there is probably some advantage to moving these very
old branches into an archive (either refs/archive/foo or a complete
archive clone) after some amount of time. Mostly because I thought new
IM? What new IM?.
Also permit the deletion of branches that have been merged with
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 16:00 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to
use
for pango), it should be 1.2, not 1-2.
Why? Surely this
Hi,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Elijah Newren new...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any
28 matches
Mail list logo
