Shaun McCance schrieb:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 22:39 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
Shaun McCance schrieb:
Avahi -- Service discovery. This is used in quite a few
places. I know some people in the past had talked about
having a simple wrapper in GLib. How much do we push it?
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Stefan Kost enso...@hora-obscura.de wrote:
Now that apple has closed the whole bonjour stack, I would prefer to build on
upnp. We have gupnp, which is actively developed and fitting nicely here.
Now I don't want to make political statements, it's pure software
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 22:39 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
Shaun McCance schrieb:
snip
Avahi -- Service discovery. This is used in quite a few
places. I know some people in the past had talked about
having a simple wrapper in GLib. How much do we push it?
Now that apple has closed the
Gravis wrote:
It works fine with Nautilus when opening files on a local
filesystem. -- http://i44.tinypic.com/t9gzye.jpg
The problem I've run into is that Nautilus will not allow me to open
files on remote filesystems (eg sftp virtually mounted file system) with
my application (doesnt appear on
Bastien Nocera schrieb:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 22:39 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
Shaun McCance schrieb:
snip
Avahi -- Service discovery. This is used in quite a few
places. I know some people in the past had talked about
having a simple wrapper in GLib. How much do we push it?
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 17:15 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
Bastien Nocera schrieb:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 22:39 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
Shaun McCance schrieb:
snip
Avahi -- Service discovery. This is used in quite a few
places. I know some people in the past had talked
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 22:39 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
Shaun McCance schrieb:
snip
Avahi -- Service discovery. This is used in quite a few
places. I know some people in the past had talked about
having a simple
Op zaterdag 16-05-2009 om 01:17 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Luis
Menina:
This stuff should be *opt-in*, and not
*opt-out*.
If I want the battery state, I can go in the power manager and choose if
I'll have an icon for that (which is good), even if it's currently in
the notification
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Stefan Kost enso...@hora-obscura.de wrote:
Now that apple has closed the whole bonjour stack, I would prefer to build on
upnp. We have gupnp, which is actively developed and fitting
Hi Luca,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote:
2009/5/15 William Jon McCann william.jon.mcc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Luis Menina liberfo...@freeside.fr wrote:
Please, don't try to abuse the system tray for things that should be
It seems to me that there are few warring ideas here about the system
tray/notification area/status notification area usage.
1) anything goes
2) programs information/icons only
3) system information/icons only
Simply put, programs have dominated this area on Gnome and every other
desktop
11 matches
Mail list logo
