2009/10/30 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk:
The point, really, is that Luca was incorrect in stating that we (GNOME)
unconditionally adopts dependencies that are not widely deployed or
fully baked. This was true (and in a sense, still is for some of these
components) for polkit,
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 00:08 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The problem is that to leverage the full power of
tracker, you need much deeper integration and its not practical to
make
it optional in those cases
This is a very general and broad statement concerning the key
element in
2009/10/30 Jamie McCracken jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com:
The way I see it is if Gnome wants to be in a position to challenge OS/X
and Windows 7 then it needs to make bold decisions. Playing it safe
means it will stagnate and Gnome will miss out on all the cool
technology.
This is kinda
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 11:18 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 00:08 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The problem is that to leverage the full power of
tracker, you need much deeper integration and its not practical to
make
it optional in those cases
This is a
