Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Adoption GNOME-ness, community:
We have pride in our incredible translation teams; it would be really
nice if Rygel had the infrastructure in place to be translated.
Is this planned?
Cheers,
Frederic
___
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:51:50AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
zee...@gmail.com wrote:
What is it?
I hate unneeded redundancy so I'll just ask you to read the home page:
http://live.gnome.org/Rygel
pbor pointed out on
From reading description, it seems to me that Rygel would be better
suited as system service. Just like for example mt-daapd (which seem
to have the same purpose as Rygel but for DAAP). How does it fit GNOME?
Absolutely correct point! Folks, when did you decided that GNOME is
for PCs only
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Sergey Udaltsov
sergey.udalt...@gmail.com wrote:
From reading description, it seems to me that Rygel would be better
suited as system service. Just like for example mt-daapd (which seem
to have the same purpose as Rygel but for DAAP). How does it fit
Hi Frederic!
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Adoption GNOME-ness, community:
We have pride in our incredible translation teams; it would be really
nice if Rygel had the infrastructure in place to be translated.
Is
Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2010, 18:12 +0200 schrieb Zeeshan Ali:
I agree but I really suck at UIs
You could ask for a review on the usability mailing list.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
It most certainly is and if it starts to become very likely that my
proposal will be approved, I'll put this in my high-priority todo
list.
Heh, the logic should be reversed :-) It can't be approved (or likely to
be
Le lundi 22 février 2010, à 16:23 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Where will the strings appear? If it's just error strings in a log file,
then they don't have to be translated, for example.
Yeah something like
Le mardi 26 janvier 2010 à 03:26 +0100, Javier Jardón a écrit :
You can see more tips and links to the documentation in the GnomeGoal
page: [3], for example:
[3] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/ModernAutotools
I read there:
Try to avoid the use of AM_MAINTAINER_MODE.
I am very
Just because others do it in a particular way, doesn't make it
right. Although Rygel can be run as a system-wide service, the main
target use-case is that of providing services per-user[1] so for
example each user can choose to share his media on the network rather
than every user's media.
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Sergey Udaltsov
sergey.udalt...@gmail.com wrote:
Just because others do it in a particular way, doesn't make it
right. Although Rygel can be run as a system-wide service, the main
target use-case is that of providing services per-user[1] so for
example
On Mon, 22.02.10 09:13, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
I hate unneeded redundancy so I'll just ask you to read the home page:
http://live.gnome.org/Rygel
pbor pointed out on IRC that I didn't really have a nice description
on the homepage so I corrected that. Please
On Mon, 22.02.10 12:08, Sergey Udaltsov (sergey.udalt...@gmail.com) wrote:
From reading description, it seems to me that Rygel would be better
suited as system service. Just like for example mt-daapd (which seem
to have the same purpose as Rygel but for DAAP). How does it fit GNOME?
Sorry for being unclear. Sure I know the difference between UPnP and
CIFS. I am just saying that approach (I incorrectly called it use
case) single system-level daemon + multiple user-controlled
user-specific resources looks architecturally better than multiple
user-level daemons.
Sergey
PS My
On Mon, 22.02.10 14:29, Sergey Udaltsov (sergey.udalt...@gmail.com) wrote:
Just because others do it in a particular way, doesn't make it
right. Although Rygel can be run as a system-wide service, the main
target use-case is that of providing services per-user[1] so for
example each
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 14:29 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
Just because others do it in a particular way, doesn't make it
right. Although Rygel can be run as a system-wide service, the main
target use-case is that of providing services per-user[1] so for
example each user can choose to
On Mon, 22.02.10 15:27, Sergey Udaltsov (sergey.udalt...@gmail.com) wrote:
That is because you seem to be keen on admin intervention while I am
keen on each user to be as free (from admin) as possible. :)
I do not really care about admin intervention, honestly. I just prefer
to have a
On Sun, 21.02.10 14:50, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote:
- The preferences UI is pretty horrible
Should we really keep the UI at all? The options offered therein appear
very esoteric to me, and a trivial addition to
gnome-file-share-properties that would just introduce one simple
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Sun, 21.02.10 14:50, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote:
- The preferences UI is pretty horrible
Should we really keep the UI at all? The options offered therein appear
very esoteric to me, and a
2010/2/22 Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de:
Well, we already run apache as part of the user session from
gnome-user-share.
GNOME is certainly focussed on the desktop, or similar user
interfaces. As such it should provide services for building user
interfaces, not server machines.
A
On Mon, 22.02.10 19:05, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) (zee...@gmail.com) wrote:
Should we really keep the UI at all? The options offered therein appear
very esoteric to me, and a trivial addition to
gnome-file-share-properties that would just introduce one simple
checkbox Share my Music (and
Hi,
2010/2/22 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org:
2010/2/22 Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de:
Well, we already run apache as part of the user session from
gnome-user-share.
GNOME is certainly focussed on the desktop, or similar user
interfaces. As such it should provide services for
Le lundi 22 février 2010 à 17:21 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
I do not really care about admin intervention, honestly. I just prefer
to have a single server process on my system, regardless of the number
of users.
That sounds like a pretty weak argument, of the Unix nostalgia
23 matches
Mail list logo
