2010/4/8 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org:
I think the GnomeGoal is small, well defined, broadly applicable and
useful. See this giggle commit as an example [3]
Can't we put stuff like test_gtkbuilder_file_validation.sh in
gnome-common? Seems a bit of a waste to add this to all files.
Richard.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:57 AM, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Shaneeb Kamran shaneebs...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de
wrote:
Hi!
I am not entirely sure but my guess is adding support for another
language
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Shaneeb Kamran shaneebs...@gmail.com wrote:
The main benefit of supporting multiple languages is more to the users of
the application than to its developers. Like I mentioned in my previous
mails, if a user wants to add a feature to his favorite application and
hi,
Am 08.04.2010 02:54, schrieb Javier Jardón:
Hello,
Paolo Borelli proposed me to create this GnomeGoal inspired by the
recent Murray post [2].
The idea is to validate our xml GtkBuilder files before we release new
tarballs (in 'make check' and 'make distcheck')
I think the
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 01:54 +0200, Javier Jardón wrote:
Hello,
Paolo Borelli proposed me to create this GnomeGoal inspired by the
recent Murray post [2].
The idea is to validate our xml GtkBuilder files before we release new
tarballs (in 'make check' and 'make distcheck')
I think the
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Shaneeb Kamran shaneebs...@gmail.com wrote:
My take is that GNOME apps should pick C + one of JS,Python and move
on with actually writing your app and fixing bugs, making it
compelling,
- Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Shaneeb Kamran shaneebs...@gmail.com
wrote:
The main benefit of supporting multiple languages is more to the
users of
the application than to its developers. Like I mentioned in my
previous
mails, if a user
