On 04/15/2010 02:05 PM, Martyn Russell wrote:
If you had a real database,
Are you suggesting SQLite is not a real database or that an application
would use a real database to continue your point?
I think what Bastien meant is if tracker exposed itself as a real
database, i.e. exposing a SQL
On 19/04/10 10:53, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
On 04/15/2010 02:05 PM, Martyn Russell wrote:
If you had a real database,
Are you suggesting SQLite is not a real database or that an application
would use a real database to continue your point?
I think what Bastien meant is if tracker exposed
Emmanuele Bassi ebassi at gmail.com writes:
*wrong*.
Moblin on netbooks required hardware acceleration.
Moblin 2.1 worked when I ran it inside a VM with a non-accelerated
video driver, albeit somewhat sluggishly as one would expect. I
wouldn't rule out the possibility that I've misunderstood
Thanks for your answers.
Emmanuele Bassi ebassi at gmail.com writes:
sorry, reply split in two - my allergies are making me less coherent
today.
No problem, I will just split my answer!
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 21:51 +, Michael wrote:
with my Clutter maintainer hat firmly on: we are not
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 00:51 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno sab, 17/04/2010 alle 00.17 +0200, Jakub Steiner ha scritto:
Icons follow the naming specification[1], but have a -symbolic suffix,
so only applications specifically looking up these symbolic icons will
render them. If a
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le vendredi 19 mars 2010, à 16:39 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
I didn't miss that. :) If you read carefully he said just to be
safe and hence it's not so important. Still, I tried to setup the
I said on the
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 14:46 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 00:51 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno sab, 17/04/2010 alle 00.17 +0200, Jakub Steiner ha scritto:
Icons follow the naming specification[1], but have a -symbolic suffix,
so only applications
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 08:44 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Maybe I missed it but why are we only concentrating on Nvidia? Are
ATI graphics cards okay vis-a-vis xrand support and others on free
drivers? What about Intel? The foundation should probably take a
holistic approach to this issue
