Hi!
As many of you probably know, GnomeCanvas is the only component that has
no replacement for 3.0 while being deprecated for some time. There was
kind of a discussion not to include any full-featured Canvas in the
future in the GNOME platform.
However, in the current state nautilus and
Hi,
Gnumeric does not use FooCanvas anymore.
Regards,
Jean
Le jeudi 06 mai 2010 à 11:46 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
Hi!
As many of you probably know, GnomeCanvas is the only component that has
no replacement for 3.0 while being deprecated for some time. There was
kind of a discussion
On 6 May 2010 11:46, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
Hi!
As many of you probably know, GnomeCanvas is the only component that has
no replacement for 3.0 while being deprecated for some time. There was
kind of a discussion not to include any full-featured Canvas in the
future in the
Hi!
Many applications now use GooCanvas which is cairo based and still maintained.
Yes, I know. Some use others. Anyway, none of them is part of GNOME and
it doesn't look like any would become that any time soon.
Johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 12:13 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
Many applications now use GooCanvas which is cairo based and still
maintained.
Yes, I know. Some use others. Anyway, none of them is part of GNOME and
it doesn't look like any would become that any time soon.
I think a
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 11:46 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
There was kind of a discussion not to include any full-featured Canvas
in the future in the GNOME platform.
For the records: For an overview of canvases see
http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley/CanvasOverview
andre
--
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing
Just a friendly reminder:
Maintainers of proposed modules are, however, expected to
contact the GNOME Documentation Team between the proposals
and the decisions (earlier is better). Please do this even
if your module already has
On 6 May 2010 15:02, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
* gnome-color-manager
I figured this would just have it's own help file. We've already got
quite a bit of content:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-color-manager/plain/help/C/gnome-color-manager.xml
Help from the docs team would be
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
These I'm not entirely clear on what they'll affect:
* rygel
Me neiher. :) If I understood correctly, you are talking about the
docs user sees when she hits the 'Help' button. Since Rygel is
supposed to be mostly
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 3.0 based on the community input from this mailing list.
If you have not commented yet, if there is anything to add, if you have
questions: Please comment now on the corresponding thread for the module
(for a specific
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 15:07 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 6 May 2010 15:02, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
* gnome-color-manager
I figured this would just have it's own help file. We've already got
quite a bit of content:
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 17:15 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
These I'm not entirely clear on what they'll affect:
* rygel
Me neiher. :) If I understood correctly, you are talking about the
docs user sees
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Thorsten Prante thors...@prante.eu wrote:
Purpose:
GNOME Activity Journal is not a File Browser but an Activity Browser.
It uses the Zeitgeist Framework to display what you did and introduces a
better way of quickly finding the things that you were doing.
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 09:32 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 17:15 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
These I'm not entirely clear on what they'll affect:
* rygel
Me neiher. :) If I
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Right, but if it allows users to do cool things, we'd like to
talk about those in the Desktop Help or elsewhere.
As soon as I proposed Rygel, someone pointed out that he doesn't
know what Rygel is so I added a user-story
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
I'm afraid I still haven't worked on the integration of Rygel into
gnome-user-share because I still don't know how we want to handle
libraries of videos in the GNOME desktop itself (and I don't mean in a
technical sense,
belatedly...
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:02, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:42:58PM -0600, Ted Gould wrote:
Q: Does this fit the the design goals for GNOME Shell?
A: I can't speak for the designers of GNOME Shell but they've talked
about how the top panel should behave like a
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:10 -0500, Michael Terry wrote:
I'm not sure if this is too early, but it's been 6 months since
modules proposals opened for 2.30, so I'm guessing it's an appropriate
time for 3.0 modules?
I think GNOME could use a backup program. There are some out there
already,
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME, especially now
that libzeitgeist has appeared, however that has little to do with the
Journal which is a centralized activity browser. That is to say adding
a Most Used feature in Nautilus or a Recently Opened With feature in
shell would use
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 13:10 -0400 schrieb Randy B:
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME
Can I ask you to please answer Colin's questions separately with
*concrete* plans (and maybe a separate section for nice to have)?
Thanks a lot,
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net |
Hi, it's the maintainer of Deja Dup again. A couple things:
1) I've been talking to the usability guys a bit about the UI in
general and thoughts on a possible Profiles interface. There's an
ongoing discussion on the mailing list (though I think I haven't been
terribly responsive in the thread)
Il giorno gio, 06/05/2010 alle 13.24 -0400, Michael Terry ha scritto:
Hi, it's the maintainer of Deja Dup again. A couple things:
1) I've been talking to the usability guys a bit about the UI in
general and thoughts on a possible Profiles interface. There's an
ongoing discussion on the
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 19:22 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 13:10 -0400 schrieb Randy B:
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME
Can I ask you to please answer Colin's questions separately with
*concrete* plans (and maybe a separate section for nice to
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Michael Terry m...@mterry.name wrote:
2) I'm still curious to get feedback on other maintainers' experience
with pulling in other regular developers once they became a GNOME
module. Frankly, I'm leery of the extra burden it would put on me in
terms of bug
2010/5/6 Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org:
* How does this affect resource consumption on the desktop - if I
don't ever launch Activity Journal, is Zeitgeist running?
That depends on whether there is something else using it. Zeitgeist
won't start until something starts it via D-Bus activation,
This is just a quick note. People often confuse Zeitgeist with the
Activity Journal. The Journal is a centralized activity browser that
uses Zeitgeist. Other implementations around the GNOME desktop will
use Zeitgeist directly unless they just want to just display a
specific day in the journal or
Some further comments below.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Randy B [mailto:email.t...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Mai 2010 02:33
An: Colin Walters
Cc: Thorsten Prante; desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Betreff: Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal
This is just a quick
Does anyone know if we have a GNOME OID, whether allocated through IANA
directly or through another private.enterprise?
An OID is used in certain software as a unique identifier, particularly
in a good deal security related protocols.
We have a need for some new OIDs in gnome-keyring, so I was
28 matches
Mail list logo
