HI,
I am trying to write some small patches/enhancements to totem. I I 've
checked out the totem source code from the project's git.
git clone git://git.gnome.org/totem
I built and installed it in a local non-system-wide directory e.g.
/home/totem-install with the folllowing commands:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 10:56 +0530, chen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 10:33 +0530, chen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 02:02 +0100, Lucas Rocha wrote:
Hi all,
I won't be able to release GNOME 2.31.3 today due to various build
failures. Here they are:
+ evolution-data-server
Hi Chen,
2010/6/10 chen pchenth...@novell.com:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 10:56 +0530, chen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 10:33 +0530, chen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 02:02 +0100, Lucas Rocha wrote:
Hi all,
I won't be able to release GNOME 2.31.3 today due to various build
failures.
El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 11:33 +0100, Lucas Rocha escribió:
Hi Chen,
This has been fixed to work with gtk version 2.21.2 and had a problem
with compiling with 2.21.1. Fixed it -
http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/commit/?id=905a30860e08f0264c746ca7a92d5b405015196c
and
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:33 +0100, Lucas Rocha wrote:
Thanks for working on this but the new tarball also has build
problems. There's no gdk_drag_context_get_selected_action() in GTK+.
You should use gdk_drag_context_get_action().
Could you please release new tarballs with this fix?
On 10 June 2010 12:24, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
This requires module maintainers to port their modules now (if you don't
want an angry release-team mob soon in front of your house).
So, should we be requesting gtk3 = 2.90 in configure.ac now? At least
for Fedora rawhide the lack of
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 10 June 2010 12:24, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
This requires module maintainers to port their modules now (if you don't
want an angry release-team mob soon in front of your house).
So, should we be requesting gtk3 = 2.90 in configure.ac now? At least
for
El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 12:49 +0200, Jan de Groot escribió:
It has been renamed, but so far there's no tarball release of gtk+ with
that change included.
Oh, I was just trying to express that a simple rename is going to break
g-d-s again in the future - I didn't mean to imply that there's no
Hi,
2010/6/10 Florian Müllner florian.muell...@gmail.com:
El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 12:49 +0200, Jan de Groot escribió:
It has been renamed, but so far there's no tarball release of gtk+ with
that change included.
Oh, I was just trying to express that a simple rename is going to break
g-d-s
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 13:42 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 10 June 2010 12:24, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
This requires module maintainers to port their modules now (if you don't
want an angry release-team mob soon in front of your house).
So, should
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 10:33 +0530, chen wrote:
I just tested compiling the 2.31.3 eds tarball and the sources from
master as well. Both are building fine. Will cross-check with someone
and come back..
It builds fine against GTK+ git master, but not against 2.21.1. Just
remove the
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
While Rygel currently depends on (and is tested with) Vala 0.8.0,
the minimum version of Vala on external deps wikipage[1] is 0.7.8 and
recommended is 0.8.1. Moreover, Jürg tells me that its the
The code for GTK+ 2.22 is on the gtk-engines-2-22 branch.
Cheers
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
