On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
I consider this an occasion for a bigger discussion on redesigning
libgnome-desktop, moving forward from being the container of useful
libgnome parts, to the One Desktop Library.
Makes sense to me. The one
Le mardi 09 novembre 2010 à 17:31 -0500, Colin Walters a écrit :
Makes sense to me. The one concern I have is whether or not we should
be continually bumping the SONAME. I'd vote for yes - more pain, but
also more correct.
Yes please. Shared libraries without correct versioning are *much*
On 11/09/10 16:33, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
Then there are microlibraries, killing which would help performance.
These include for example libgtop, libgweather and libgnomekbd, but also
liboobs if the system tool backends are not dead.
I can't find an use for them outside core desktop, while
Behdad:
I'd say no. If it's already in a library that does not break its API every
other week, let it be there. That's the correct design anyway. Something
like libgweather does not belong in a generic desktop library.
libgweather is GPL, so it is probably not something that could be
