Holes in the GNOME 3 process - meet in 45 minutes

2010-12-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
Just a reminder that we want to meet in #release-team in ~45minutes and talk about the subject - how to make GNOME3 a smooth release. Matthias ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Holes in the GNOME 3 process - meet in 45 minutes

2010-12-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
Some notes from the meeting: 1) How do we mark blocker issues in bugzilla ? The '3.0 blocker summaries' on the product overview pages (eg http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=gtk%2B ) are based on the 'Gnome target' field. It turns out this field is only shown for certain products, and

Re: Holes in the GNOME 3 process - meet in 45 minutes

2010-12-07 Thread Frederic Crozat
2010/12/7 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com: 6) Can we do something like nightly spins ? We used to have isos that were produced by rpath at torrent.gnome.org, but that system is not functional anymore. Ideally, we'd have a way to use jhbuild to 'build onto an iso'. Unfortunately, we

Volunteer needed: Snapshot live image project

2010-12-07 Thread Owen Taylor
So currently trying out GNOME 3 requires one of two things: either installing some operating system under heavy development, or doing a day-long jhbuild from source. At the meeting today we were discussing that we'd like to have another option - that if we want to do QA or user testing on the

Re: Volunteer needed: Snapshot live image project

2010-12-07 Thread Frederic Crozat
2010/12/8 Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com: So currently trying out GNOME 3 requires one of two things: either installing some operating system under heavy development, or doing a day-long jhbuild from source. At the meeting today we were discussing that we'd like to have another option - that