El jue, 30-12-2010 a las 22:34 +0100, Johannes Schmid escribió:
> Despite that and this is what this thread is about, GNOME will maintain
> a non-3D user-experience in the future which will likely use some
> components of the GNOME 2.x stack but ported to GNOME 3 technologies (no
> parallel install
Johannes:
GNOME 2.x will not get any more official support after the 2.32.1 relase
which already happened. Single module maintainers may decide (or have
already decided/done) to do more 2.32.x release to fix various bugs but
no more official releases are planned.
This is not different from GNO
Hi Brian!
Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2010, 13:03 -0600 schrieb Brian Cameron:
> For example, I have concerns about how GNOME 2.x is going to be
> maintained in the long run, and I think a lot of issues raised in this
> discussion relate to such concerns. To me, it seems that GNOME 2.32
> and later
Emmanuele:
On 12/28/10 10:50 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:42 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
As pointed out before the fallback-mode is not a continuation of
GNOME 2. It was just the easiest way to create a fallback because we
don't have the resources to create a non-3D
Le jeudi 30 décembre 2010 à 14:42 +0200, Stefan Kost a écrit :
> We (the GStreamer project) work on this right now. The current git of
> gst-plugins-base has GstEncodeBin and a profile library. This will be
> part of a tarball release in January. We're still working on utility
> functions for app
Johannes Schmid wrote:
> > For example, I cannot personally consider the shell as usable as long as
> > it features those unusable two-dimensional iPhone menus - not counting
> > the fact I don’t own hardware that can run it. The panel’s menu is
> > simply better thought.
> >
>
> Sidenote: check
Le jeudi 30 décembre 2010 à 13:08 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
> Sidenote: check jhbuild of gnome-shell, it has categories again in the
> menu.
It is great to learn this has been finally fixed, thanks.
> So in the future, please don't express opinion on things that you
> haven't tested.
I
On 12/29/2010 11:18 PM, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Hello everybody.
Have you any plans for the encoding profiles manager and for the GNOME
media converter for the Gnome 3?
For some times I work on a software, an audio and video converter based
on Gnome technology (GTK+, GStreamer, etc) and I wish
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:54:04AM -0500, Bill O'Connor wrote:
> You can also expect that installers won't be providing a choice between
> version 2 and version 3 of GNOME, but rather a choice between
> gnome-panel and gnome-shell, with gnome-panel possibly being the
> default.
Which distribution
Hi!
> For example, I cannot personally consider the shell as usable as long as
> it features those unusable two-dimensional iPhone menus - not counting
> the fact I don’t own hardware that can run it. The panel’s menu is
> simply better thought.
>
Sidenote: check jhbuild of gnome-shell, it has
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le mercredi 29 décembre 2010 à 15:22 -0500, William Jon McCann a écrit
> :
>> That simple JS based fallback panel/menubar idea is sounding better
>> and better... anyone want to give it a shot?
>
> This would be completely useless. Who would use that?
>
> Just because i
Le mercredi 29 décembre 2010 à 15:22 -0500, William Jon McCann a
écrit :
> That simple JS based fallback panel/menubar idea is sounding better
> and better... anyone want to give it a shot?
This would be completely useless. Who would use that?
People are not attached to the panel just because th
12 matches
Mail list logo
