I cannot believe I am reading this on GNOME central mail list!
[ snip ]
I cannot believe this topic keeps coming up again and again :-(
Linux is not about choice:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html
Guys, I can't believe I'm readeing this again. If
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:23:39AM -0800, Baybal Ni wrote:
Now, tell me what you and Mr. Olav are trying to infer with this discussion?
Suggest to read the thread. I'm totally not getting why you're involving
me and some other person days after the thread is over.
Note to all: I'm closing the
Hi,
GNOME maintainers developers need a place to co-ordinate efforts
running up to GNOME 3.0, co-ordinate which bugs are blockers, which
features modules need work and who's working on them, etc.
This (the desktop *devel* list) is the best place for that to happen,
but the list is far too
FYI,
A group of researchers leaded by Jim Herbsleb got in contact with GNOME
Foundation some months ago in order to research how communities works,
how a volunteer become an active contributor, among others.
In the following days, developers (committers) will receive and
invitation to complete a
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 11:16 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
GNOME maintainers developers need a place to co-ordinate efforts
running up to GNOME 3.0, co-ordinate which bugs are blockers, which
features modules need work and who's working on them, etc.
This (the desktop *devel* list) is the
Hi,
Owen Taylor wrote:
I'd like to propose that we move the list to strict moderation for the
next couple of months - anything not to do with development (code, docs,
i18n, continuous integration) related to GNOME 3 should be filtered out.
Priority should be given to maintainers developers
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 18:37 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
In particular, note the following mailing lists:
* gnome-annouce-list - all software announcements
* gnome-list - discussions/questions about how to use GNOME
Does gnome-list cover the design process of user experience?
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 22:34 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
On Friday 07 January 2011 13:57:42 Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
FYI,
A group of researchers leaded by Jim Herbsleb got in contact with GNOME
Foundation some months ago in order to research how communities works,
how a
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 13:45 -0800, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
Since people from Others section also got the invitation (like
me), I
wonder, whether the results of the questions regarding making GNOME
better and
the effort taken into GNOME may become a bit inapropriate, as those
aren't
Christopher Roy Bratusek schreef op vr 07-01-2011 om 23:00 [+0100]:
By others he probably mean components not in desktop/platform etc.
sets (marked as Others in bugzilla, git etc.) and therefore not part
of GNOME (like banshee, vala, libgee etc.)
Exactly.
Yet there is broad consensus those
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 04:57 -0800, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
FYI,
A group of researchers leaded by Jim Herbsleb got in contact with GNOME
Foundation some months ago in order to research how communities works,
how a volunteer become an active contributor, among others.
In the following
11 matches
Mail list logo
