Hi Erik,
> a few days ago I read about the "platform-wide feature proposal
> period" of gnome 3.2 and I want to know how can someone using gnome
> not gnome developer propose something to get included into gnome ?
>
> I have some ideas, and I want to discuss those with gnome developers,
> how do
Hi,
So speaking as someone who was motivated to make writing GNOME apps
easier, I'm not very happy with how things turned out with the mix of
gjs/seed/python/introspection/gtk3.
In this mail I just want to focus on the gjs/seed situation. Before
3.0 we chose to use gjs for gnome-shell for a vari
Thanks. Will do.
On 4/20/11, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 15:52 -0400, Super Bisquit a écrit :
>> gnome-session: http://slexy.org/view/s20L2lzAD0
>> gnome-shell: http://slexy.org/view/s21z3rtwzu
>>
>> Compiler runs with default values. Two UltraSPARCIII 750MHz cpus.
>
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 15:52 -0400, Super Bisquit a écrit :
> gnome-session: http://slexy.org/view/s20L2lzAD0
> gnome-shell: http://slexy.org/view/s21z3rtwzu
>
> Compiler runs with default values. Two UltraSPARCIII 750MHz cpus.
Thanks for the report, but please use Bugzilla to report crashes.
gnome-session: http://slexy.org/view/s20L2lzAD0
gnome-shell: http://slexy.org/view/s21z3rtwzu
Compiler runs with default values. Two UltraSPARCIII 750MHz cpus.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman
Hi!
> a few days ago I read about the "platform-wide feature proposal
> period" of gnome 3.2 and I want to know how can someone using gnome
> not gnome developer propose something to get included into gnome ?
>
> I have some ideas, and I want to discuss those with gnome developers,
> how do I do
Hi:
a few days ago I read about the "platform-wide feature proposal
period" of gnome 3.2 and I want to know how can someone using gnome
not gnome developer propose something to get included into gnome ?
I have some ideas, and I want to discuss those with gnome developers,
how do I do that ?
Erick
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 11:54 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mi, 2011-04-20 at 10:58 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Di, 2011-04-19 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:45 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
On Di, 2011-04-19 at 09:12 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:45 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> > Another conceptual problem is that the server cannot communicate well
> > with the user. A client might pop up rich dialogs and ask the user for
> > help in cases that it cannot d
On 04/20/2011 11:51 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
[...]
It seems to me the architecture of Meego SSO is very security focused.
Indeed it is.
[...]
However I think that this could get in the way of broader adoption. In
order to succeed, you would need patch every GNOME application and
library to not
On Mi, 2011-04-20 at 10:58 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Di, 2011-04-19 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:45 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Regarding couchdb: how complete is its data model? W
Le mardi 19 avril 2011 à 11:32 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > I am also of the opinion we want a single panel; but I think the
> > design of the "online accounts" panel should allow the accounts that
> > are currently in the "
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 09:43 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:48 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:29 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > > As Frederic pointed out, we shouldn't be brainstorming on the 3.2
> > > feature pages, so I thought I'd fill in some d
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Di, 2011-04-19 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:45 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
> > > Regarding couchdb: how complete is its data model? When it first
> > > showed up, SyncEvolution had some problems wi
On 04/19/11 16:12, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 04/19/2011 04:08 PM, David Zeuthen wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> One of the things I'm looking at doing for 3.2 is the Web Accounts panel:
>>
>> http://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne/Features/Sharing
>
> See the "Current status" section in that page. We alrea
On 04/20/2011 10:08 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
SSO daemon (signon)
Dependencies: Qt, libcryptsetup
Provided functionality:
- Secure storage of user credentials
- Provides authentication tokens to applications
- SASL plugin, OAuth and plain password plugins are available; more can/should
be writ
Hi David,
On 04/19/2011 05:42 PM, David Zeuthen wrote:
I did briefly look at http://gitorious.org/accounts-sso/accounts-glib
but quickly got lost as that appears to be just the client-side GLib
glue. And some of the other stuff looked pretty specific to Meego.
No, it isn't just a glue thing :-
17 matches
Mail list logo
