On 05/14/2011 11:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
The fact that we have only one implementation means that we have one
well maintained implementation. I don't think it's much of a problem. Do
you have particular reasons why you think that supporting multiple
backends is actually useful?
On Fri, 13.05.11 14:59, Robert Ancell (robert.anc...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm proposing LightDM [1] as a replacement for GDM. I started the
proposal for this in GNOME 3.0 [2] but due to the young age of the
project I thought it better to wait until 3.2 before making a full
proposal. This is
On Sat, 14.05.11 12:31, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello Matthias, Dave,
Matthias Clasen [2011-05-13 8:33 -0400]:
* Language Selector, which allows you to configure your language and
fallbacks ($LANGUAGE/$LC_MESSAGES), locale ($LANG), list of
installed
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 12:31 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Matthias, Dave,
Matthias Clasen [2011-05-13 8:33 -0400]:
* Language Selector, which allows you to configure your language and
fallbacks ($LANGUAGE/$LC_MESSAGES), locale ($LANG), list of
installed languages (packages
Hey Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2011-05-15 18:26 +0200]:
Just out of curiosity, what's the mechanism Ubuntu uses to forward
user locale settings to the system? i.e. what's the path to make locale
configuration system-wide with Ubuntu?
Debian/Ubuntu store the system-wide default in
Colin:
Your report missed the following bug, which is a better example of some
of the more serious issues Canonical had working with upstream GDM:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587750
As you can see in the bug report, Robert was not provided with much
real support or guidance
Bastien:
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 13:43 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
GDM has evolved into a display manager that is most focused on tight
integration with GNOME. This is perfect for GNOME users and distros
that focus on GNOME users. However, GDM is not always a good choice
for other desktop
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:15:02PM +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Sounds like it should be both a new feature and a part of GNOME core. It
would be great to be able to introduce it as a feature in 3.2.
I've started a feature page here [1].
[1]
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi Zeeshan,
Hi Shaun,
Could you or another GUPnP developer work with me to create
a page for it in the Platform Overview?
I was doing that some weeks ago (actually your mail about that is in
my inbox so i don't
Hello Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2011-05-15 21:10 +0200]:
Sure, that I know, but what I was wondering is how the unprivileged user
code that g-c-c is can make changes to this root-owned file. What is the
machanism used here?
Right, our language-selector has a polkitified D-BUS service for
Let's try that again...
On Sunday, 15 May 2011 at 20:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
(Background: I am
working on cleaning up all those little services that can change
locale/clock/timezone/hostname/... in the context of systemd)
In case you were not aware, in MeeGo 1.2 we've added a clock
Hi,
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
Let's try that again...
On Sunday, 15 May 2011 at 20:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
(Background: I am
working on cleaning up all those little services that can change
locale/clock/timezone/hostname/... in the context
On Sunday, 15 May 2011 at 22:14, David Zeuthen wrote:
If only you'd use the standard org.fd.DBus.Properties interface here
then it would be a lot easier to use via e.g. GDBusProxy and other
bindings. And it's a lot easier to inspect with tools like gdbus(1) or
d-feet(1). Not saying it's
Hi,
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Brian Cameron brian.came...@oracle.com wrote:
Yes, you are right. GDM does not currently use OpenGL.
My comment was meant to be understood as an example of how GDM may be
moving in a direction that requires certain hardware or only works on
certain
Hi,
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Brian Cameron brian.came...@oracle.com wrote:
Your report missed the following bug, which is a better example of some
of the more serious issues Canonical had working with upstream GDM:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587750
As you can see in
On Sun, 15.05.11 22:50, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Heya,
Lennart Poettering [2011-05-15 21:10 +0200]:
Sure, that I know, but what I was wondering is how the unprivileged user
code that g-c-c is can make changes to this root-owned file. What is the
On Sun, 15.05.11 22:01, Ross Burton (r...@burtonini.com) wrote:
Let's try that again...
On Sunday, 15 May 2011 at 20:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
(Background: I am
working on cleaning up all those little services that can change
locale/clock/timezone/hostname/... in the context of
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:30:56PM -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Yes, you are right. GDM does not currently use OpenGL.
My comment was meant to be understood as an example of how GDM may be
moving in a direction that requires certain hardware or only works on
certain operating systems.
18 matches
Mail list logo
