On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 15:38, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems this is
> not going to be blessed by GNOME, and questionpro.com only allows 10
> questions in the free version. I haven't found a better free online
> survey, and unless somebody offers hosting for this survey, it woul
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Narek Babadjanyan wrote:
> I have read that the fallback mode is not actively developed, and besides
> that who needs fallback if graphics card's drivers are fully supported (at
> least in my case it's so), so you are right, I'm talking about the
> gnome-shell-exte
Hi,
Here's the next version of the survey. Unfortunately, it seems this is
not going to be blessed by GNOME, and questionpro.com only allows 10
questions in the free version. I haven't found a better free online
survey, and unless somebody offers hosting for this survey, it would
have to be limite
hi,
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 12:22 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> Because maintainer mode existing is really annoying when you are a
> packager, and tying arbitrary unrelated changes to an option that is
> documented as only changing the make rules is just wrong.
>
> --enable-maintainer-mode enable m
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:52 +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> > the above help string might then just suggest that I would rather define
> > my own --enable-maintainer-mode when I want to cover more things under
> > it.
>
> If you do so, please don't call it --enable-maintainer-mode. I agree
> with
Milan Crha a écrit:
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 12:22 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
>> --enable-maintainer-mode enable make rules and dependencies not useful
>> (and sometimes confusing) to the casual installer
[...]
>
> the above help string might then just suggest that I wo
