On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
...
So a possible view for this feature can be done in Web: Links received can
then be automatically put in the queue of Web. And once visited can be taken
out of the queue.
Another possible view would be a dialog for
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
...
So a possible view for this feature can be done in Web: Links received can
then be automatically put in the queue of Web. And once visited can be taken
I would like to quote Allan Day (from another public mail thread):
---
I realise that you're frustrated by the lack of Zeitgeist adoption in
GNOME, Seif. As I explained privately, the best way for you to pursue
this is to talk to maintainers who might need it for search results.
The decision to
I've talked to several of my coworkers, and they just think Zeitgeist
is the right technology for anything they're trying to do. A number of
people thought the time-based approach wasn't neat enough. They
brought up the recent flames over the Recently Used selection by
default in the
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 12:59 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We have a design and a plan for finding
and reminding, and Zeitgeist doesn't seem like the right technology to
implement that plan.
Who's we? Where is this plan? And why isn't it going through
the feature proposal process?
--
Shaun
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 12:59 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We have a design and a plan for finding
and reminding, and Zeitgeist doesn't seem like the right technology to
implement that plan.
Who's we?
We, the GNOME
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 13:46 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 12:59 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We have a design and a plan for finding
and reminding, and Zeitgeist doesn't seem like the right
Shaun McCance wrote:
Your previous email seems to indicate that the features for 3.6 are
already a foregone conclusion, and that Zeitgeist doesn't fit into
that. But that just can't be, because WE the GNOME community decide
what's in the next version right here on d-d-l during the proposal
Hi,
thanks Shaun for your reply, unfortunatly looks like who decides everything
for GNOME Project are the Design team or the RedHat employees and not the
community. This makes me belive that the community no longer has the power
to decide anything that aren't the way that the designers planned,
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 13:46 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 12:59 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We have a design and a plan
OK seems like i sent the mail to only Jasper (damn-reply to all)
Again I repeat. I am not talking about features.
Web is using an SQLite DB to store its HISTORY. This is code that they
need to maintain themselves.
Are the Web developers allowed and blessed to use Zeitgeist to store
that history.
Hey Luis.
Very good question. Zeitgeist and Tracker are compeletely different.
Tracker is a metadata storage. It is used to store tags and
information about files and other data on your computer.
Zeitgeist is a log. It is a very intelligent and responsive log. We
can not do what tracker providers.
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 13:46 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 12:59 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We have a design and a plan for finding
and reminding, and Zeitgeist doesn't seem like the right
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not saying that the feature proposal process is perfectly clear
though. ;)
It's a little rough, because we are only talking about features; we don't
really get to address new technologies or libraries that we might
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
thanks Shaun for your reply, unfortunatly looks like who decides
everything for GNOME Project are the Design team or the RedHat employees
and not the community.
Please, can we not finger specific companies when
2012/4/21 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
thanks Shaun for your reply, unfortunatly looks like who decides
everything for GNOME Project are the Design team or the RedHat employees
and not the community.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/4/21 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.orgwrote:
Hi,
thanks Shaun for your reply, unfortunatly looks like who decides
everything for GNOME
We haven't really gotten off the ground with 3.6 feature proposals
yet, so I'll make a start by announcing something that I hope to
complete for 3.6: A nice initial setup experience.
I have created a feature page describing this here:
http://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/InitialSetup
On 21 April 2012 21:47, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
We haven't really gotten off the ground with 3.6 feature proposals
yet, so I'll make a start by announcing something that I hope to
complete for 3.6: A nice initial setup experience.
I have created a feature page
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:48:59AM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
For instance, let's say Xan who has indicated some interest to use Zeitgist
in Web wanted to use it but not add any new features but instead uses Zg to
store bookmarks then really does this process help that? Does he even need
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:48:59AM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
For instance, let's say Xan who has indicated some interest to use
Zeitgist
in Web wanted to use it but not add any new features but instead uses Zg
to
21 matches
Mail list logo
