On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi, just to clarify: For 3.12, you would like to drop support for
running gnome-shell or mutter on X directly and only support Wayland?
I understand that X apps will still run on top of GNOME Shell on
Wayland.
Why you
hi Jeremy;
yes, unported applications still using X11 should be able to run
unmodified under an hybrid X/Wayland compositor. what Matthias was
detailing for the 3.12 cut-off cycle is running GNOME Shell as a
Wayland compositor by default, instead of an X11 one.
ciao,
Emmanuele.
On 15 March
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Spring is in the air - things change, people are looking for things to
try and new goals. I propose that we set ourselves a new goal: port
GNOME to Wayland
Wayland has reached the 1.0 milestone recently and it
hi Tristan;
On 18 March 2013 08:31, Tristan Van Berkom t...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
features. Lastly, the GTK+ Wayland backend needs some love to reach
parity with the X backend. We will retain the ability to run X
On 15/03/13 18:32, Matthias Clasen wrote:
For more details about Wayland see: http://wayland.freedesktop.org
For more details about this proposal, see http://live.gnome.org/Wayland
Let me know what you think,
Hi Matthias, I had a few questions to satisfy my own curiosity :)
I am neutral
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 12:10 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
What are the benefits of moving to Wayland?
I rather enjoyed the recent talk [1] given by Daniel Stone six weeks ago
at LCA. I'd encourage anyone interested in learning more about Wayland
who doesn't already know everything about it to
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Tristan Van Berkom t...@gnome.org wrote:
I'm asking this out of my own curiosity... what kind of porting work
would be required for an 'application' to be ported to wayland ?
Shouldn't that be transparent for most applications by virtue
of linking against
On 18 March 2013 05:10, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
Is this likely to cause regressions or be problematic with OpenGL or Wine
based aps/games running on the GNOME shell desktop? I understand vaguely the
relationship between GTK+ and Wayland, but not how a raw GL based
application
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi, just to clarify: For 3.12, you would like to drop support for
running gnome-shell or mutter on X directly and only support Wayland?
I understand that X apps will still run on top of GNOME Shell on
Wayland.
I'm not
fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:32 -0400 skrev Matthias Clasen:
Spring is in the air - things change, people are looking for things to
try and new goals. I propose that we set ourselves a new goal: port
GNOME to Wayland
Wayland has reached the 1.0 milestone recently and it has already had
some
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:58 AM, stefan skoglund(agj)
stefan.skogl...@agj.net wrote:
fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:32 -0400 skrev Matthias Clasen:
I dont think Redhat wants to have the same type of conversation they had
with an client about GVFS bad behaviour when running over NFS if an
On Monday, 18 March 2013 at 14:58, stefan skoglund(agj) wrote:
I wont be able to run wayland on my machine (old nv20-based graphical
card.) Anyone with a spare agp card with really good support in current
day X.org (http://X.org) ?
Weston can composite with pixman, you don't need accelerated
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:50:49AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi, just to clarify: For 3.12, you would like to drop support for
running gnome-shell or mutter on X directly and only support Wayland?
I understand that
We have a gnome-integration list dedicated to integrating GNOME into
environments. That would be a great place to discuss and figure it out.
I'd like to see if we can make GNOME better in environments like yours.
Login performance is slow even without NFS. Boot up performance to GDM
seems to
mån 2013-03-18 klockan 09:10 -0700 skrev Sriram Ramkrishna:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:58 AM, stefan skoglund(agj)
stefan.skogl...@agj.net wrote:
fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:32 -0400 skrev Matthias Clasen:
I dont think Redhat wants to have the same type of
15 matches
Mail list logo
