Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Olav Vitters
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see Nice initiative! -- Regards, Olav

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Done, Thanks! 2014-01-29 meg ford > Feel free to push them for gnome-sound-recorder. I'll check in the next > few days and if you haven't had a chance I will do this myself. > > Thanks, > Meg Ford > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Mustieles García < > daniel.mustie...@gmail.com> wr

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread meg ford
Feel free to push them for gnome-sound-recorder. I'll check in the next few days and if you haven't had a chance I will do this myself. Thanks, Meg Ford On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Mustieles García < daniel.mustie...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's the same I though in a firs't stage, bu

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
That's the same I though in a firs't stage, but didn't want to generate problems... if after some days, there are some remaining modules to commit, I'll push them directly Thanks Hughsie! 2014-01-29 Richard Hughes > On 29 January 2014 15:03, Andika Triwidada wrote: > > Do you think all those

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Richard Hughes
On 29 January 2014 15:03, Andika Triwidada wrote: > Do you think all those hundreds modules need to be addressed one by one > manually? I'm only talking for myself now, but I'd be surprised if any maintainer is going to say no to those patches. If I were you, I'd just commit the changes, and apol

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
alacarte, gnome-music and gnome-menus patches commited Thanks! 2014-01-29 Vadim Rutkovsky > On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > > gnome-music > > Feel free to push the changes directly to the repo. > > > -- > Thanks, > Vadim > > _

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Andika Triwidada
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Andika Triwidada wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >>> devhelp >> >> I didn't find a bug report for this one, please do file one and I'll >> have a look. > > Hi Fred, Robert, > > In https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bu

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Andika Triwidada
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> devhelp > > I didn't find a bug report for this one, please do file one and I'll > have a look. Hi Fred, Robert, In https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 I wrote 'complete' list modules who caught this bug. I b

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Vadim Rutkovsky
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > gnome-music Feel free to push the changes directly to the repo. -- Thanks, Vadim signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Mustieles García < daniel.mustie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see > this metabug for more information: > https

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Thanks Fred and Robert, I've sent patches via bugzilla, so you can review them. Cheers! 2014-01-29 Robert Roth > Hi Daniel, > > gnome-system-monitor >> > > There's no report for system monitor yet, but please do file one with the > patch attached and it will get reviewed fairly soon. > > Rega

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Robert Roth
Hi Daniel, gnome-system-monitor > There's no report for system monitor yet, but please do file one with the patch attached and it will get reviewed fairly soon. Regards, Robert ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://ma

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Frederic Peters
Hi Daniel, > devhelp I didn't find a bug report for this one, please do file one and I'll have a look. > jhbuild https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721532 feel free to attach a patch and it will be quickly reviewed. Fred ___ desktop-

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Thanks Debarshi and Hughsie! Your modules are fixed and bugs have been closed. Cheers! 2014-01-29 Richard Hughes > On 29 January 2014 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García > wrote: > > gnome-control-center > > gnome-desktop > > gnome-software > > Fine with me, thanks. > > Richard >

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Richard Hughes
On 29 January 2014 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > gnome-control-center > gnome-desktop > gnome-software Fine with me, thanks. Richard ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desk

Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Debarshi Ray
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles Garc?a wrote: > gnome-online-accounts Sure, go ahead. Thanks, Debarshi -- Wearing non-prescription glasses and embracing obscurity doesn't necessarily make you a hipster. -- Anonymous pgphNaS0sF5VU.pgp Description: PGP signature

Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Hi all, I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see this metabug for more information: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 Below is the list of the affected modules so, If you agree w