Re: GSOC - Four-in-a-row Four-in-a-row AI (mentors: MichaelCatanzaro)

2014-03-10 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 20:15 +, João Martins wrote: > Hi > I saw "Four-in-a-row For-in-a-row Al" in gnome GSOC ideas list and i > thinks this is a challenging and interesting idea , want to know if is > possible i participe in this project? Hey João, You'll notice on the ideas page, there is

another look at blocker bugs

2014-03-10 Thread Matthias Clasen
Here's another look at the list of bugs marked as 3.12 blockers: clutter -- 723085 Clutter's event handling can get "stuck" under ClutterGTK+ | looks like a complicated issue, and only reported with a 'fringe' wm, so maybe | best to defer clutter-gtk -- 695737 Add wayland supp

Re: Status of privacy features in GNOME

2014-03-10 Thread Oliver Propst
Ok thanks for the info, then I guess its the promo text for the campaign that still apply. On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tobias Mueller wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Stef Walter wrote: >> Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any >> im

screen darken when gnome-terminal activated

2014-03-10 Thread chenzero
Hello, after upgraded to the latest Ubuntu 12.04, 3.2.0-59-generic-pae, I encountered a problem is, screen will darken when gnome-terminal is activated, however, if use the system color in the profile of gnome-terminal, the screen is OK. Please help, thanks! chenzero ___

Status of privacy features in GNOME

2014-03-10 Thread Oliver Propst
Hi, I'm active in the GNOME engagement team and are currently working on a article about the 2012-2013 privacy campaign for the GNOME annual report. To complete the article I need know what privacy features have been implemented as a result of the campaign. Information about this are very much appr

Re: Announce: Gjs documentation almost ready!

2014-03-10 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
-- Sriram Ramkrishna (sriram.ramkrishna_@@_...@.gmail.com (remove _@@_) On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > I want to say publicly that everybody who does not invite Giovanni for a > beer next GUADEC is a complete moron. > > I am Alberto Ruiz. And I approve this message. >

GSOC - Four-in-a-row Four-in-a-row AI (mentors: MichaelCatanzaro)

2014-03-10 Thread João Martins
Hi I saw "Four-in-a-row For-in-a-row Al" in gnome GSOC ideas list and i thinks this is a challenging and interesting idea , want to know if is possible i participe in this project? Best Regards João Martins ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-de

Re: Python Docs (was Re: Coordination for developer documentations)

2014-03-10 Thread Christoph Reiter
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Simon Feltman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Christoph Reiter > wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Simon Feltman wrote: >>> * GI function argument interpretation for Python docs would be as >>> close as possible to pygobject by having the argumen

Re: Python Docs (was Re: Coordination for developer documentations)

2014-03-10 Thread Christoph Reiter
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Stefan Sauer wrote: > devhelp is basically the index.sgml (ignore the sgml extension, it is > not) + prerendered html. devhelp does not do anything with the link in > the html doc, except trying to follow them when one is clicked. OK, thanks for the clarification

Re: Coordination for developer documentations

2014-03-10 Thread Allan Day
Frederic Peters wrote: ... >> Developer documentation will be a topic during the Developer >> Experience Hackfest, but I believe we will fail again to provide >> lasting effects if nobody takes on a coordination role. ... > But I'm a bit lost since the decisions that were agreed at the Berlin > ha

Re: Coordination for developer documentations

2014-03-10 Thread meg ford
> On 7 March 2014 17:45, meg ford wrote: > > It would also be awesome if whoever takes the lead on this makes sure > that > > the functionality we are documenting actually works. If we want devs to > be > > able to write GNOME apps then having documentation that matches the > > functionality they

Re: Python Docs (was Re: Coordination for developer documentations)

2014-03-10 Thread Frederic Peters
Stefan Sauer wrote: > On 03/08/2014 06:15 PM, Christoph Reiter wrote: > > I've tried the devhelp export and it seemed to work quite well for the all > > in one API docs. But I'm not sure how linking between different Sphinx > > builds would work with devhelp. (but I have no idea how devhelp does i

Re: Coordination for developer documentations

2014-03-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 7 March 2014 17:45, meg ford wrote: > It would also be awesome if whoever takes the lead on this makes sure that > the functionality we are documenting actually works. If we want devs to be > able to write GNOME apps then having documentation that matches the > functionality they can access usi