Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2014, 20:55 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> Is there a Bugzilla ticket already about displaying a warning banner?
>
> With regard to internet search engine indexing,
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509424 was about "Only let
> search engined index stable, unsta
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 08:11 -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> Google is particularly shit at pointing people to the correct version.
> If we choose to have multiple versions still, we should put a giant
> warning at the stop saying it's not the current version, and perhaps
> have a version switcher
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> While I'm sure a dynamic site would be a great idea in the far future, are
> there any small, actionable goals we can make for this?
>
> We all dream of a great docs scenario, but we never properly plan for it.
> What small wins can we get today, right now, to improve th
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 19:50 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> []
> No, I think the obstacle is that we don't have enough people willing
> to work on developer documentation over something else, even though
> many will recognize the importance it has. It's not new.
Touché.
--
Germán Poo-Caamaño
While I'm sure a dynamic site would be a great idea in the far future, are
there any small, actionable goals we can make for this?
We all dream of a great docs scenario, but we never properly plan for it.
What small wins can we get today, right now, to improve the experience? I
have some free time
Allan Day wrote:
> However, before we go down that route, it seems like we should at
> least discuss whether library-web is the best option going forward. It
I would tend to put goals before technical details, but library-web as
it is nowadays is certainly not the best option; I addressed a few o
Frederic Peters wrote:
...
> Since the hackfest in Norwich in January it's possible to get specific
> modules online (almost) directly after the git commits. It is
> configured that way for gnome-user-docs and gnome-getting-started-docs
> (for help. gnome.org) and for gnome-devel-docs (developer
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:46 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Fred's done a
> fantastic job keeping library.gnome.org going, but we probably need
> something else (or at least major improvements).
I did not know this existed!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> ...
>> We need a volunteer or many volunteer who can help here. Happily will
>> mentor or find a mentor who is willing to put the time.
>>
>> Anybody interested in getting this reviewed and working?
>
> I was primarily
Google is particularly shit at pointing people to the correct version. If
we choose to have multiple versions still, we should put a giant warning at
the stop saying it's not the current version, and perhaps have a version
switcher.
Also, while we're modifying the version infrastructure, can we ma
Allan Day wrote:
> Much of these issues come down to infrastructure, in my opinion. It's
> hard to get into writing docs, the website doesn't show what's new or
> updated, and it is slow to get new material online. Fred's done a
> fantastic job keeping library.gnome.org going, but we probably need
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
...
> We need a volunteer or many volunteer who can help here. Happily will
> mentor or find a mentor who is willing to put the time.
>
> Anybody interested in getting this reviewed and working?
I was primarily referring to the documentation website and related
infrastru
On 09/03/2014 11:42 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> == at-spi ==
>
> Using AtspiCollection to match via interfaces seems broken and causes crashes
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734805
> Crash should be fixed (commit bb89b1), but more cleanup work listed in last
> comment
We talked
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Another question. On the header bar menus page:
>
> "Header bar menus are not a good choice for performing actions on
> selected content: when content hasn't been selected, the menu will
> contain unhelpful insensitive menu items, when it has been selected,
> possible ac
Lasse Schuirmann wrote:
...
> Some feedback from me:
>
> Typography
>
> One thing that is missing IMO in the font size discussion is the uglieness
> of absolute font sizes. In the "Universal Access" menu you have the "Large
> Text" option: if you use absolute font sizes these wont
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
...
> I haven't looked over the platform-demos yet, and certainly at none of
> the Python ones, besides to note that the screenshots look very
> outdated. As a developer, this makes me question the relevance of the
> material.
>
> I'm not saying the material is bad, just t
Hi Andre,
> == gsettings-desktop-schemas ==
>
> Location Service should be disabled by default
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735736
I looked and commented but I don't know how to resolve it. Perhaps
Allan has a better idea?
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
___
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 10:38 +0800, 藍挺瑋 wrote:
> It still doesn't work ...
> gmake[4]: Entering directory `/home/lantw44/gnome/source/mutter/src'
> CC x11/events.lo
> In file included from x11/events.c:39:
> ./wayland/meta-wayland-private.h:23:10: fatal error: 'wayland-server.h'
> file not f
Jasper St. Pierre 於 2014/09/04 10:18 寫道:
> It should be resolved. I landed some more commits to fix the issue. If
> you still can't compile without Wayland, please let me know.
>
> It's not easy for me to test compiling without Wayland right now, so
> I'd appreciate your help on this.
>
Mutter work
19 matches
Mail list logo
