On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de
wrote:
Oh no, that's not what I meant. I was more proposing to pull them
once, while you develop your stuff, and then shipping them in your own
tarball. So, don't pull them dynamically when you start building, but
you keep
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, at 10:10, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
FWIW, if you run devhelp with jhbuild, you will get documentation
for
the version of the library in jhbuild.
This is only true if the docs are actually built,
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 08:05 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
[snip]
Handout:
http://people.collabora.com/~pwith/feedback-from-downstreams/handout.pdf
That mentions this:
Gtkmm's documentation is poor in comparison to GTK+'s and it works
really badly in Devhelp. Searching (an important feature we
Hi Ray.
Thanks a lot asking about this.
OpenBSD *will* keep using ConsoleKit for 3.16. I expect that we should be
able to be rid of it for 3.18 -- either using systembsd (far from ready) or
the logind implementation that ConsoleKit2 is expected to provide iirc or ...
something else.
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 16:51 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
Documentation is generated from C comments as at the moment,
reformatted, uploaded to developer.gnome.org, and then some kind of
online interface can be used to edit the documentation (and possibly
add
comments to it) with instant
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 16:31 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:37:32PM +, Philip Withnall wrote:
What do you mean by reaching out to the advisory board? Reaching out for
further feedback from them as downstreams, or reaching out for resources
to fix such issues? I
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:11 +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Devhelp could also have a 'next' or 'latest' default profile which could
sync the daily? built documentation from gnome.org. Although not sure
how useful this could
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 19:56 -0800, Philip Chimento wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Philip Withnall
phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 12:19 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:05:00AM +, Philip Withnall
wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 11:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 09:23 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Searching of gtkmm documentation has been working in devhelp for
years,
and I've just tested it here both in regular Ubuntu and in jhbuild. I
mean, searching of the index, of
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
[..]
I'm wondering if there are distros/platforms that are planning on
using 3.16 and ConsoleKit together.
[..]
I would not mind removing such support for 3.16 if and only if
reverting the removal is easy and not too intrusive.
Hi,
I'm wondering if there are distros/platforms that are planning on
using 3.16 and ConsoleKit together.
I'm leaning toward getting rid of it in 3.16 (versus say 3.18).
Distros, of course, could ship a patch to reverse to removal if
necessary, so I don't think doing it for 3.16
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
Can't we hide it behind a --this-is-going-away-in-3.18 configure switch?
That was certainly a possibility, but, what's the advantage of doing
it? The bug Antoine pointed to shows that distros that use ConsoleKit
in 3.14
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 09:23 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Searching of gtkmm documentation has been working in devhelp for
years,
and I've just tested it here both in regular Ubuntu and in jhbuild. I
mean, searching of the index, of course. I don't think devhelp offers
full text search for any
hi,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, at 10:10, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
FWIW, if you run devhelp with jhbuild, you will get documentation for
the version of the library in jhbuild.
This is only true if the docs are actually built, which is not the case
by default (and, unless we dramatically improve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2015 05:51 PM, Philip Withnall wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 07:55 -0800, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Feb 2, 2015 6:37 AM, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 12:19 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Feb
15 matches
Mail list logo
