Re: Death of gnome-common

2015-06-23 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 08:33 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: > As Kalev says, we should ensure this still builds with various > distros. > RHEL7 is fine. Debian stable (Jessie) has 1.14. Fedora has had ≥ 1.13 > for a long time. Arch has 1.15. FreeBSD has 1.15. > > So unless anybody objects, I think

Re: Death of gnome-common

2015-06-23 Thread Philip Withnall
Hey Emmanuele, Philip On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 17:08 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > that's usually better replaced by: > > autoreconf -if || exit $? > test -n $NOCONFIGURE && ./configure $@ > > Which isn't shorter, but it's pretty much to the point and works fine > in jhbuild and autobuilders. Wh

Re: Death of gnome-common

2015-06-23 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi Philip; that's usually better replaced by: autoreconf -if || exit $? test -n $NOCONFIGURE && ./configure $@ Which isn't shorter, but it's pretty much to the point and works fine in jhbuild and autobuilders. Ciao, Emmanuele. On 23 June 2015 at 16:54, Philip Chimento wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2

Re: Death of gnome-common

2015-06-23 Thread Philip Chimento
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Philip Withnall wrote: > On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 17:56 -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Philip Withnall < > > phi...@tecnocode.co.uk> wrote: > > > See literally the first migration item on > > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Gn

Re: Death of gnome-common

2015-06-23 Thread Philip Withnall
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 10:44 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 16:36 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: > > Do we require automake 1.13 though? > > Looks like it was released January 1, 2013... so we should. We *could*; doesn’t necessarily mean we *should*. > > Automake 2.0 isn’