Re: Maintainers, please read this. [Re: GNOME 3.19.2 unstable tarballs due]

2015-11-24 Thread Frederic Peters
Shaun McCance wrote: > Question: If I don't intend to make a release because there haven't been > any changes, do you want me to send an email saying so? Nope, that's already something we check before chasing people :) And while it's important to get stable releases out when the only changes

Re: Maintainers, please read this. [Re: GNOME 3.19.2 unstable tarballs due]

2015-11-24 Thread Shaun McCance
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 12:09 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > Hi! > > > Tarballs are due on 2015-11-23 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 3.19.2 > > unstable release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Modules which > > were proposed for inclusion should try to follow the unstable schedule > > so

Maintainers, please read this. [Re: GNOME 3.19.2 unstable tarballs due]

2015-11-24 Thread Frederic Peters
Hi! > Tarballs are due on 2015-11-23 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 3.19.2 > unstable release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Modules which > were proposed for inclusion should try to follow the unstable schedule > so everyone can test them. Please make sure that your tarballs will > be