Re: Problems regarding jhbuild

Hi Michael, On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 14:49 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Anyway, the problem is a bootstrap version of vala needs to be > installed as a sysdep, but we can't make a sysdep for it until the vala > developers stop pointlessly bumping their pkg-config version early > single release.

Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

Hello all, Quoting Simon McVittie (2016-10-10 20:57:01) > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:57 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > Can you propose what the necessary change would be to: > > > > > >  

Re: Problems regarding jhbuild

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 01:03 +0530, Abishek Kumar wrote: > can anyone of you help me with this. I would really like to > contribute to > gnome from here on. Thanks in advance. Hi, This vala build error was actually the last straw when I decided to remove Ubuntu from the list of supported distros.

Re: Problems regarding jhbuild

On 10/10/2016 12:33 PM, Abishek Kumar wrote: *** Checking out vala *** [20/30] git remote set-url origin git://git.gnome.org/vala git remote update origin Fetching origin git rebase origin/0.34 Current branch 0.34 is up to date. *** Configuring vala *** [20/30]

Problems regarding jhbuild

Hey I am facing difficulty in building the JHbuild from the below instruction page: https://wiki.gnome.org/Newcomers/BuildGnome I get the below error when i run the following command: $jhbuild build adwaita-icon-theme dconf glib-networking gvfs libcanberra *** Checking out vala *** [20/30]

Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:57 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > I agree about whatever we switch GNOME over to en-masse, but for > scattered projects, I'm less sure, and I'm particularly less sure > about > CMake, where there seems to be a certain lack of uniformity. Hm yes, that's one of the

Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:37 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:51 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > To get them building again from HEAD again, what you can do is add > > a > > compatibility configure script as described in: > > I don't want to add compatibility configure

Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:51 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > Javier has tagged evolution and evolution-data-server to pre-cmake > > versions in gnome-continuous. > > Hi, > I know, I coordinate the change with Javier online. He already gave

Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:51 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > To get them building again from HEAD again, what you can do is add a > compatibility configure script as described in: I don't want to add compatibility configure scripts to GNOME modules that switch to CMake or Meson. Continuous should just

Maintainer needed for Bijiben

Hi all, The Notes app (also known as Bijiben) needs some new blood. It has been slipping recently and is probably going to end up being dropped altogether. This would be a real shame because a lot of work has gone into it and it has loads of potential. On the design side we have lots of

Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 17:06 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:33 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > I plan to merge the changes the next Monday, October 10th, some > > time > > after the 3.22.1 release. This way there will be enough time to > > catch > > any issues before the 3.23.1

Some dudes opinion on Ctrl-Tab

I'm sorry about bumping issue, but I'd like to give my two cents and see if you'd like to reconsider this issue. First, the argument of popularity. + All major web browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Internet Explorer, Opera, Midori and others) use ctrl-tab to switch tab. Neither nor consumes

Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:33 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > I plan to merge the changes the next Monday, October 10th, some time > after the 3.22.1 release. This way there will be enough time to catch > any issues before the 3.23.1 release. Hi, this is a notice that the changes had been

Re: Proposal for Gnome Goal (was Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products)

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 08:39 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 10:04 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: > > > > I don’t think we’ve ported enough modules as testbeds yet. Meson is > > too new > > to jump into encouraging everyone to port GNOME modules en-masse. > > > > Maybe the

Re: Proposal for Gnome Goal (was Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products)

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 10:04 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: > I don’t think we’ve ported enough modules as testbeds yet. Meson is > too new > to jump into encouraging everyone to port GNOME modules en-masse. > > Maybe the goal could be proposed in 6 months once Meson has matured a > bit > more and

Re: Proposal for Gnome Goal (was Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products)

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 10:49 +0200, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote: > On 05/10/16 15:39, Michael Biebl wrote: > > So while I'm not tied to autotools, I would hate to see if every > > modules maintainer chooses his/her own build system of choice. This > > makes it really cumbersome as

Re: Proposal for Gnome Goal (was Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products)

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 10:49 +0200, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote: > On 05/10/16 15:39, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > > As much as I hate autotools and its arcane syntax, it does bring > > uniformity and consistency. > > Atm I'm counting waf (for some non-core modules), autotools, cmake and > >

Proposal for Gnome Goal (was Re: Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products)

On 05/10/16 15:39, Michael Biebl wrote: As much as I hate autotools and its arcane syntax, it does bring uniformity and consistency. Atm I'm counting waf (for some non-core modules), autotools, cmake and some are discussing to use meson/ninja. So while I'm not tied to autotools, I would hate