On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:57 PM wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro
>> wrote:
>> > Looking over #8, I think duplicate issues, canned
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:57 PM wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > Looking over #8, I think duplicate issues, canned replies, and
> > dependencies between issues should all be considered blockers to
> > issue
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
Looking over #8, I think duplicate issues, canned replies, and
dependencies between issues should all be considered blockers to
issue tracker migration.
Carlos has pointed out that there is rudimentary (not very
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Philip Withnall
wrote:
>
> child_type = CHILD_TYPE (g_object_ref (parent_type));
>
> That will add a compile-time explicit cast, and a runtime type check.
> (As always, the runtime type check is disabled if GLib is built without
> debugging
On 12/11/2017 10:15 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
That's what tags are for, given that "dependencies" and "blockers" in
Bugzilla are flat lists of bug numbers — unlike, say, Phabricator's
trees of issues.
Fair enough, actually. That does work to replace tracker bugs, which is
my main use case
On 11 December 2017 at 15:51, wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>>
>> I was providing my opinions on which issues should be blockers for GNOME.
>> I'm not issuing demands here... Carlos is running this show.
>
>
> I
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
I was providing my opinions on which issues should be blockers for
GNOME. I'm not issuing demands here... Carlos is running this show.
I updated a tracker bug today: