Re: Clarifications regarding GNOME Online Accounts

2019-02-16 Thread mcatanzaro
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 2:57 PM, Nathan Graule via desktop-devel-list wrote: A solution would be for distribution package maintainers to use the binary tarball as a base instead of sources - this way the build can be done with secrets (ie. using GitLab CI and environment variable secrets) and

Re: Clarifications regarding GNOME Online Accounts

2019-02-16 Thread Nathan Graule via desktop-devel-list
A solution would be for distribution package maintainers to use the binary tarball as a base instead of sources - this way the build can be done with secrets (ie. using GitLab CI and environment variable secrets) and sent to distributions for packaging. This certainly puts GNOME in a unique

Re: Clarifications regarding GNOME Online Accounts

2019-02-16 Thread mcatanzaro
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:57 PM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: It's not clear to me how g-o-a can continue to exist, then. Also, Epiphany's Safe Browsing support. (How do Firefox and Chromium make this work?) Turns out it's a new restriction that took effect on January 16, 2019. So probably

Re: Clarifications regarding GNOME Online Accounts

2019-02-16 Thread mcatanzaro
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:58 AM, Michael Terry wrote: “Developer credentials (such as passwords, keys, and client IDs) are intended to be used by you and identify your API Client. You will keep your credentials confidential and make reasonable efforts to prevent and discourage other API

Re: Clarifications regarding GNOME Online Accounts

2019-02-16 Thread Michael Terry
Thank you for the clarification! As someone that had been confused about the intent and ended up relying on GOA in my third party app, it’s nice to see the intention spelled out so clearly. I just wanted to mention an interesting challenge in having open source apps handle this themselves.