Hi folks,
Sorry for the delay in response here - the last 24 hours have not been fun.
Trying to address the main bits of feedback here:
1. The original issue that Michael Catanzaro reported (Matrix->IRC PM
going missing) was a legitimate bug in the bridge. The bridge is meant
to display an e
Hi,
We're going to release GNOME 3.35.91 next week. (Tarball deadline is
Saturday! Please release your tarballs now!) Only problem is, nobody is
really testing 3.35.90 yet, defeating the purpose of having the beta
release.
A couple years ago, we've pushed our releases earlier just a bit
(ge
Hi folks,
We been in contact with Matthew from Matrix for some time already. I lately
didn't have much time to invest on this, so we had have some delays on
answering. However, it's our expectation that with the set up that we have
right now the IRC bridge should perform as its best, as we are usi
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:15 pm, Britt Yazel wrote:
Attached is an image of the compact mode + dark theme. Just for the
record.
The thing is, it really comes down to personal preference. I suspect we
have a lot of people who like web clients, and a lot of people who just
don't. With open pro
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:14 am, Benjamin Berg
wrote:
One could do this comparison properly. But it would need setting up a
private Matrix server for GNOME (possibly without Federation) and then
checking how well it holds up when compared to Rocket.Chat.
gnome.modular.im is already our "priva
In the spirit of using modern tooling, please direct responses to the
discourse post on this topic.
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/initiative-proposal-chat-communication-platforms/2794
Link
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 10:12 -0500, Link Dupont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have been discussing the future of GNOM
Hi,
We have been discussing the future of GNOME's communication platform
for years now, and no real progress comes out of it, except for a
further fracturing of our community. I propose we form a team of
people, representative of different factions of the community
(developers, system administrato
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:27:21 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 20:21 +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> > > My concern would be the "federal" nature of matrix where people
> > > don't need a
> > > gnome.org specific chat account to join a room. Whilst there are a
> > > lot of
> > >
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 20:21 +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> > My concern would be the "federal" nature of matrix where people
> > don't need a
> > gnome.org specific chat account to join a room. Whilst there are a
> > lot of
> > arguments for this I'm increasingly convinced it's an anti-feature
>
The only reason I use matrix is that allows me to not loose any comment
while I'm not connected. If we can recover the IRC log not, there's no need
for it.
If we can log off to avoid people talk to ghost users that's another
improvement.
Hands up everybody that claim IRC is just perfect but have
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:35 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:09 pm, Britt Yazel wrote:
> > I have had horrible experiences with Matrix/Riot.im. I'm not sure
> > which of those is due to the IRC bridge or which is due to Matrix
> > itself, or which is due to the clients
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 15:32 -0800, Britt Yazel wrote:
> Can you explain to me what the big issue with web clients are? I keep
> hearing over and over again that developers don't want to use web
> clients, either in browser or with Electron, but I don't recall ever
> hearing a "why" in there.
O
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 14:09 -0800, Britt Yazel wrote:
> this is not going to be an academically backed response, just my
> personal take.
>
> I have had horrible experiences with Matrix/Riot.im.
Too bad you missed out on actually mentioning what your experience was.
So it's very hard to relat
13 matches
Mail list logo
