Re: bug-buddy integration

2009-03-11 Thread Brian Nitz
Luis Villa wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 23:28 +0100 schrieb Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier: Apport[1] is a system which is able to send a very complete crash log to a bug tracker system (not necessary the Ubuntu's

Re: bug-buddy integration

2009-03-11 Thread Brian Nitz
Luis Villa wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Brian Nitz brian.n...@sun.com wrote: Luis Villa wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 23:28 +0100 schrieb Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier: Apport[1

Re: Low memory hacks

2008-03-04 Thread Brian Nitz
Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:05 +, Brian Nitz wrote: Third, there's no such thing as locale-specific fonts. If a font happens to cover Chinese only, so be it. Finally, if you don't need those fonts, simply don't install them (or uninstall them). I

Re: Low memory hacks

2008-03-03 Thread Brian Nitz
Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:32 +, Brian Nitz wrote: For example, launching eog in the C locale (Solaris Nevada build 82, GNOME 2.20.2) opens font files for many other locales. These may be mapped into physical memory at times, regardless of your locale

Re: Low memory hacks

2008-02-29 Thread Brian Nitz
Kalle Vahlman wrote: 2008/2/29, Nickolay V. Shmyrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Heh, I also would like to delete all .po files if only I knew how to keep translations :) Deleting .po:s would be futile as those are just the sources from which the actual (binary) files loaded are compiled

Re: Extreme memory usage for gnome-panel related apps

2007-11-30 Thread Brian Nitz
I typically leave gnome-panel (gnome 2.20.1 on Solaris Nevada) running for weeks in a Sun Ray session. The heap does appear to be growing over time: pmap -x of gnome-panel process BEFORE restart of gnome-panel: 22817: gnome-panel --sm-client-id 11819cdc2800011951517610052150048 --scr

Re: Timelapsed backgrounds

2007-09-26 Thread Brian Nitz
It sounds like an interesting idea. One thing I wonder about with anything that changes the screen synchronized to a clock is if it can be randomized somewhat so that it wouldn't cause a network storm in cases where all thin client screens attached to a single server are set to goatse at

Re: Desktop sounds in Gnome

2007-03-26 Thread Brian Nitz
Thomas Wood wrote: On 23 Mar 2007, at 19:26, Glenn J. Mason wrote: things super simple from a user perspective. Do we really need, and do users really care about, different sounds for questions, information, battery low, etc. my personal

Re: Desktop Session Presence Manager

2007-01-23 Thread Brian Nitz
Galaga does seem to have what it takes, but if it doesn't quite meet Alex's needs, I'd suggest extending Galaga rather than reinventing the wheel. I looked at Galaga a few months ago when I was considering how to notify IM applications and other desktop applications that I'm not here so that,

Re: The future of session management in GNOME

2006-09-14 Thread Brian Nitz
Tommi Komulainen wrote: On 9/13/06, Brian Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do we ever log out? 4) Free up resources. ??? Reason 4 is especially interesting for multiuser systems, especially thin clients. It might be interesting for embedded uses of GNOME (laptop/child, maemo

Re: The future of session management in GNOME

2006-09-13 Thread Brian Nitz
Ray Strode wrote: * XSMP does a number of useful session-managey things (logout notification, logout cancellation, specifying apps that should be restarted right away if they crash, specifying commands to run at logout, etc) which we currently have no

Re: downstream bugs [was Re: GnomeClient replacement?]

2006-07-26 Thread Brian Nitz
Luis Villa wrote: On 7/19/06, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luis Villa wrote: * distros are all crap at getting their bugs upstream, pretty much. (Some are slightly better than others, at various times.) So now that we've got XML-RPC support in bugzilla, it would be

Re: Migration Paths for New Modules

2006-07-21 Thread Brian Nitz
Shaun McCance wrote: On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 13:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: Yikes, all right. We should definitely keep the exec_ats key for legacy. I suppose the Assistive Technology Preferences dialog should continue to set the old values, if possible, to keep older machines

Re: focus!

2006-07-19 Thread Brian Nitz
Do we know what level of accessibility is possible within the current mono framework? Do we know what level of accessibility is likely (e.g. with C# apps ported from other platforms?) Bill Haneman wrote: Federico said: Big tangent: the GNOME Certification plan will help in defining what