Re: getting on a longer release cycled

2006-09-07 Thread David Neary
Hi, Hubert Figuiere wrote: I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month release schedule of Gnome to do a major release with a certain number of feature that would involve possible infrastructure changes in the platform. More important than moving away from the

Re: Wiki changes [Was: Personas]

2006-07-15 Thread David Neary
Hi, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=David Neary Look at RecentChanges regularly. It used to be available as an RSS feed, but that seems to have dropped off with the recent upgrade. The RSS feed is definitely still there, and you can turn on diffs as well, which is very handy. You can put

Re: Time to heat up the new module discussion (from digest)

2006-07-15 Thread David Neary
Hi, Alvaro Lopez Ortega said: BTW, if you read Sun's people arguments on this thread, it seems that they don't like much the idea. snip That is the right way. Novell should take advantage for their technology, not try force the rest to adopt it. I haven't seen any opinion from

Re: Time to heat up the new module discussion (from digest)

2006-07-14 Thread David Neary
Hi, Darren Kenny wrote: I'm not totally against C# applications themselves - what I am for is choice. I don't think any thing other than C should be part of Core GNOME - to put anything other than C into here can cause loads of problems - what happens if we start to do all our main

Mono/GTK#/Tomboy

2006-07-13 Thread David Neary
Hi, Elijah said: And the big question: We currently allow desktop modules to depend on the pygtk bindings, but no others. Should we extend that to include the gtk# ones (assuming, of course, that gtk# is added to the bindings set)? Let me rephrase that question: (Language X) is par of the

Re: Tomboy in 2.16 (lets get this over with) (from digest)

2006-04-22 Thread David Neary
Elijah Newren wrote: 1. gtk-sharp isn't (yet) in the bindings set (and I haven't seen it proposed by its maintainer(s)) 2. gtk-sharp isn't yet a blessed binding dependency (only python is so far; though there doesn't seem to be any objection so far so this one looks pretty good if 1 goes

Re:Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]

2006-04-20 Thread David Neary
Hi, Elijah Newren said: But, a more important question: We currently only allow apps using the python bindings into the desktop. Is this true, or is it just because no-one's ever asked? I don't see any reason why a gtkmm app like glom couldn't be considered for the desktop - I wasn't aware

Re: Alt Mouse Modifier (from digest)

2006-02-07 Thread David Neary
Hi, Alexey Rusakov wrote: Elijah Newren wrote: Just a me-too on how unfortunate the Alt modifier thing for window moving is. I know of at least one major piece of third-party software that uses Alt as a modifier for certain mouse operations, and it's been doing so since long before Gnome

Re: Change servers timezone to UTC (was: Bugzilla will be DOWN Sat 9 April 17.00-20.00 UTC)

2005-04-08 Thread David Neary
work in UTC and leave the server's current time zone as it is? Am I the only one who doesn't care what timezone is on bugzilla mail? And can we please stop spamming half a dozen lists? Dave. -- David Neary Director, GNOME Foundation [EMAIL PROTECTED