on the stable
branch should distributions want this.
Yours truly,
Ruben
[1] This means: if you want to see something backported to stable, ask
us!
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 13:36 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 19/03/10 12:59, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 18:12 +0200, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
2 things come to mind:
- Tracker shouldn't need to use D-Bus to access its database read-only:
related tasks, pop on over to
#soc-admin, join the soc-mentors-list and let one of the
administrators for the program know you want to be involved in making
GNOME rock.
This year's administrators are Ruben Vermeersch, Christophe Fergeau and
Daniel Siegel (and Sandy Armstrong, for as long as his
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:05 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
Still its seems to have caught a lot of people by surprise. All the
people here that are not so much in favour of this change, seems to only
have heard of it *after* the decission has been made. Its totally
obvious that people in charge
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 10:18 +0100, Xavier Claessens wrote:
Hi,
In GNOME 2.28 some default settings changed for the desktop:
1) In toolbar, text is next to icon instead of below.
2) Icons got removed from menus.
3) Icons got removed from action buttons in dialogs.
1 and 2 were still
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 14:23 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:04 -0500, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 10:55 +0100, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
Having a ton of icons is certainly not good, but is there anything
that shows that having none at all is better
as separate components to propose, given the different issues
involved.
R
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-sharp-beans
[2]: http://gitorious.org/gio-sharp
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
that we messed up.
Sorry for the confusion.
Does this mean we should all update our doap files?
Ruben
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
to a more modern way of trust, one that maintains a 1:1 mapping
between changelog and changes?
Kind regards,
Ruben
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
,
Ruben
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
% of the population runs machines that are
sufficiently capable.
Ruben
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
the disadvantages (looking at the usage patterns, not the
technical merits).
R
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
infrastructure problems.
[1]: http://gitorious.org/projects/gitorious
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
thumbnail cache somewhere around there.
Doesn't that defeat the purpose of having a thumbnail spec in the first
place?
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http
mean that you
would no longer have thumbnails lying around for deleted files and it
could also clean out thumbnails that haven't been *accessed* after a
certain time period, which should give better performance.
More info about this here: http://live.gnome.org/ThumbnailerSpec
--
Ruben
-or-expand
dialog in the housekeeper for the max_size check.
Drop the dialog and just assume the user will click yes, not knowing
what he approved. The end result is the same for 99% of the users...
They really don't care about this crap and neither should they.
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http
,
Ruben
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
the relationship/differences between these two?
Kind regards,
Ruben
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
print dropdown, it uses the word sheets, while it clearly seems
to apply to document pages.
--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
20 matches
Mail list logo
