Removing old icons from gnome-desktop

2010-08-07 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, For years, gnome-desktop has shipped with old icons that get installed in /usr/share/pixmaps. See http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-desktop/tree/pixmaps Unless somebody shouts loud in the next few days, I'll remove those icons from master (ie, gnome-desktop that is targetted at 3.0).

Re: Removing GnomeDesktopItem API from gnome-desktop

2010-08-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010, à 14:41 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Hi, I want to remove the GnomeDesktopItem API from gnome-desktop. It's an old API that is not needed anymore in our world with GKeyFile and GDesktopAppInfo. This is now gone in master (but still there in the gnome-2-32

gsettings-desktop-schemas shared gsettings keys for 2.32

2010-08-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, I was thinking how to make sure we don't have a real issue with gsettings and gconf at the same time for 2.32, and after some discussion, it seems a simple solution would be to just not ship gsettings-desktop-schemas as part of GNOME 2.32. This means GNOME 2.32 would have no shared gsettings

Re: GNOME 3.0 in March 2011

2010-07-29 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le jeudi 29 juillet 2010, à 09:45 +0200, Paolo Borelli a écrit : libpeas relies on introspection, if introspected bindings and in particular pygobject are not going in 2.32 then I am not sure it makes sense to use it. At least for gedit, we do not want to break plugin api/abi multiple

Re: GNOME 3.0 in March 2011

2010-07-29 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi Bastien, Le jeudi 29 juillet 2010, à 09:56 +0200, Bastien Nocera a écrit : I believe I also mentioned that problem in various discussions at GUADEC and I would have expected the release team to come up with a good definition before telling people to backtrack on the changes required by the

Re: GNOME 3.0 in March 2011

2010-07-29 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 29 juillet 2010, à 10:41 +0200, Piñeiro a écrit : A explaination of what it is required from part of the applications would be good, for example what it is expected related to gsettings and gtk 3.0 to this release. It is not strictly required for 2.32 to port to GSettings and GTK+

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-07-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010, à 20:04 +0200, Felix Riemann a écrit : Hi all! Am Freitag, den 02.07.2010, 15:10 +0200 schrieb Vincent Untz: Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010, 02:24 +0200, Vincent Untz a crit : Here we go: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vuntz/gsettings-desktop-schemas

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-07-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010, à 20:40 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : So I was hoping that someone would do the changes proposed by Christian before I do a release :-) If people are happy with schemas that will change, I can certainly do a 0.0.1 tarball in two minutes. Andre pushed me, so here

Re: Using AS_ALL_LINGUAS instead of po/LINGUAS

2010-07-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 16 juillet 2010, à 18:20 +0100, Ross Burton a écrit : The use-case for this was that with transifex the translators translate and submit .po files, but LINGUAS is never touched. Did you file a bug against transifex? :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

Re: (L)GPLv3

2010-07-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 05 juillet 2010, à 21:58 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : hi Vincent, On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 17:18 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: It's worth thinking really hard before moving to LGPLv3 (at least; not sure about GPLv3): LGPLv3 is incompatible with GPLv2, according to the FSF; that's

Re: (L)GPLv3

2010-07-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 06 juillet 2010, à 09:26 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:12 +, j...@jsschmid.de wrote: Well, while I guess all my modules are LGPL/GPLv2+ would that still prevent me from linking against LGPLv3 things if I don't convert them to GPLv3? No. At the

Re: (L)GPLv3

2010-07-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mardi 06 juillet 2010, à 09:00 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : hi Vincent, On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Do you feel okay with the idea of allowing proprietary apps to use our platform but not GPLv2 apps? In short, yes. Anybody who has an application

Re: (L)GPLv3

2010-07-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 05 juillet 2010, à 10:48 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : hi Everyone, I recently received an email from a company in our ecosystem asking me to relicense a smallish piece of code from GPLv3 to (L)GPLv2. I'm not really interested in inciting a flamewar on the topic or anything, but

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-07-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 04 juillet 2010, à 08:28 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 02:24 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mercredi 30 juin 2010, à 17:16 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Here we go: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vuntz/gsettings-desktop-schemas/ Since packages

Re: desktop schemas review [was: Re: GSettings migration status]

2010-07-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le samedi 03 juillet 2010, à 13:37 +0200, Christian Persch a écrit : Hi; I think we should use the opportunity of converting to gsettings to redesign the desktop schemas, not just do a 1:1 translation from gconf. Let me make some remarks about the gsettings desktop schemas as they

Removing GnomeDesktopItem API from gnome-desktop

2010-07-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, I want to remove the GnomeDesktopItem API from gnome-desktop. It's an old API that is not needed anymore in our world with GKeyFile and GDesktopAppInfo. Thanks to Andre, here's a list of modules using it. I've put them in some categories: With patches: - gnome-applets

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-07-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010, à 08:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr wrote: On a side note, I'd like somebody to point me to the module responsible for the /desktop/gnome/peripherals/mouse/cursor_theme key. I can't

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-07-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010, à 12:21 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat a écrit : Note it may be nice for translators to use the _description hack until proper gschema support lands in intltool, so that they can start working on the package. I think it'd be more efficient to just use the same amount

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-07-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010, à 02:24 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le mercredi 30 juin 2010, à 17:16 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le mercredi 30 juin 2010, à 16:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : For some of my other modules, I'm actually waiting on desktop-wide settings, and in some

Re: Removing GnomeDesktopItem API from gnome-desktop

2010-07-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010, à 06:12 -0700, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, I want to remove the GnomeDesktopItem API from gnome-desktop. It's an old API that is not needed anymore in our world with GKeyFile

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-07-01 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 30 juin 2010, à 17:16 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le mercredi 30 juin 2010, à 16:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : For some of my other modules, I'm actually waiting on desktop-wide settings, and in some cases, lockdown keys. Gah, my fault. I had forgotten about this. I'll

Re: GSettings migration status

2010-06-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 30 juin 2010, à 16:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:43 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote: Hi everyone, snip According to http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone the schedule as of June 28 says that we should have no fewer than 20 modules depending on GConf.

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

2010-06-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 02 juin 2010, à 09:35 +0200, Simon van der Linden a écrit : On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 02:41 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 01 juin 2010, à 19:11 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit : 2) Will the Applications be something official that you have to nominate modules for and follow

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

2010-06-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 02 juin 2010, à 10:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote: The long term plan for the GNOME applications that were removed from the Desktop, Admin and Dev Tools modulesets is to simply highlight the

Re: GSettings and desktop-wide keys

2010-06-01 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 01 juin 2010, à 15:29 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit : ma., 31.05.2010 kl. 00.56 +0200, skrev Vincent Untz: Le dimanche 30 mai 2010, à 23:13 +0200, Felix Riemann a écrit : Hi! I started to migrate Eye of GNOME to GSettings and found that we use several keys that live

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

2010-06-01 Thread Vincent Untz
Hey, Le mardi 01 juin 2010, à 19:11 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit : On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:37 +0100, Lucas Rocha wrote: Hi all, The release team would like to propose some important changes in the way we organize our modulesets. GNOME releases are currently organized into the

Re: GSettings and desktop-wide keys

2010-05-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 30 mai 2010, à 23:13 +0200, Felix Riemann a écrit : Hi! I started to migrate Eye of GNOME to GSettings and found that we use several keys that live in GConf's /desktop/gnome path. These are specifically the lockdown settings and the desktop background which are defined in a

Re: external dependency review

2010-05-27 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 27 mai 2010, à 07:03 -, j...@jsschmid.de a écrit : Hi! libgda 4.0.8 Anjuta will require 4.2 (or 4.1.x for now). Vivien promised a 4.2 release in time for GNOME 3.0. I updated jhbuild and the wiki page to use 4.1.6. And this does indeed fix the anjuta build.

2.31.2 release will be a bit late -- current status

2010-05-26 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, I won't be able to complete the release of 2.31.2 today (or well, yesterday for me now). I still have various build failures: gvfs telepathy-farsight empathy epiphany gnome-sharp gnome-desktop-sharp gnome-games gnome-system-tools sound-juicer anjuta evolution-webcal yelp Some notes about

Re: Updated WebKit external dep

2010-04-07 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 07 avril 2010, à 11:57 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit : I've just updated WebKit dep to 1.2.0 stable release in the following places: * jhbuild 2.30 moduleset * jhbuild 3.0 moduleset * 2.30 external deps page on live.gnome.org Can you also update

Re: Need more tarballs for 2.30.0

2010-03-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mardi 30 mars 2010, à 06:05 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Hi all, Thanks to everybody who released tarballs for 2.30.0. Unfortunately, many modules should have a new tarball but don't. And we need help from you here! Thanks to everybody who helped! We're now in a much better shape

Need more tarballs for 2.30.0

2010-03-29 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, Thanks to everybody who released tarballs for 2.30.0. Unfortunately, many modules should have a new tarball but don't. And we need help from you here! Please look at the lists below (they're not sorted, or actually they're sorted alphabetically, but first with items from platform, then

Re: Freeze break request

2010-03-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 mars 2010, à 15:19 -0500, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : We are in hard code freeze. I included i18n only as an informative measure. This is not covered by the hard code freeze, so you can go ahead. Vincent On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Gabor Kelemen kelem...@gnome.hu wrote:

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-03-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 mars 2010, à 16:39 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit : I didn't miss that. :) If you read carefully he said just to be safe and hence it's not so important. Still, I tried to setup the I said on the safe side because I've no good example of when those strings would appear.

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-03-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 mars 2010, à 17:17 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit : On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: I didn't see your request for help on irc, and I'm sure many people didn't. Thats ok, people have better things to do. :) Just to be clear, I

Re: RFC: Status Icon A11y info

2010-03-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 17 mars 2010, à 15:55 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : Jon, should we add a mention about gtk_status_icon_set_name() so that icons are correctly sorted in the notification area? The notification area doesn't use the names to sort items; it was decided instead to use a fixed order for

Re: Libwnck signals

2010-03-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 15 mars 2010, à 18:38 +0530, Nischal Rao a écrit : Hi, Can anybody please tell me how to handle signals for Libwnck? The documentation for Libwnck doesn't have any info on this. Can you clarify? It's just standard signals, so you should use the usual GObject mechanisms to connect to

Re: How do I request a patch review?

2010-03-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 08 mars 2010, à 21:56 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit : On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:51:49PM -0800, MPR wrote: On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: Conclusion: Test this patch extensively. Ideally have some distribution perhaps include it, wait for

GSettings hackfest

2010-03-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, We're working on organizing a GSettings (and dconf) hackfest in April: http://live.gnome.org/Hackfests/GSettings2010 It would be in Cambridge (MA, USA). As written on the wiki page, the goals are: + make sure gsettings and dconf are rock-solid + land the missing bits in glib + define a

Re: GSettings hackfest

2010-03-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Allo, Le vendredi 05 mars 2010, à 09:30 -0500, Colin Walters a écrit : Hi Vincent, On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: We're working on organizing a GSettings (and dconf) hackfest in April:  http://live.gnome.org/Hackfests/GSettings2010 It would

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 février 2010, à 16:23 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit : On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Where will the strings appear? If it's just error strings in a log file, then they don't have to be translated, for example. Yeah something like

Re: External Dependency Proposal: libappindicator

2010-02-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 février 2010, à 14:16 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit : Hi; I would like to propose libappindicator as an external dependency. libappindicator is a simple library that provides a way for an application to put a menu inside an application specific area, most typically on a

Re: Libgda's minimum required version

2010-02-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 09 février 2010, à 21:20 +0100, Vivien Malerba a écrit : Hi! Libgda is an external dependency and I would like to propose to recommend version 4.0.7 instead of the currently recommended version 4.0.0: * there is no API/ABI change between the 2 versions * many bugs have been

Re: Updated webkit version to 1.1.21

2010-02-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 10 février 2010, à 11:56 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit : I've just updated WebKitGtk required version here [1] and in jhbuild moduleset for 2.30. Version 1.1.21 is required by Epiphany. Thanks. Btw, I guess it's fine to assume there'll be a version of WebKitGtk that will be

Re: GNOME 2.30 and udisks (the module formerly known as DeviceKit-disk)

2010-01-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 20 janvier 2010, à 21:41 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit : I was rebuilding from scratch my jhbuild sandbox, when gnome-disk-utilities failed due to missing udisks pkg-config file. I tried to search for a released udisks package, but the only one I found is a git snapshot here[1].

Re: Updates for external dependancy for evolution-mapi

2010-01-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 18 janvier 2010, à 15:07 +0530, Johnny Jacob a écrit : Hi, Minimum version required for openchange is bumped from 0.8 to 0.9 [0] (by mistake pushed the changes to evolution-mapi). Do you plan any such change before 2.30 is out? If no, please go ahead :-) Vincent -- Les gens

Re: Updates for external dependancy for evolution-mapi

2010-01-18 Thread Vincent Untz
;-) Here's what it should have been: Do you plan more openchange version bumps for 2.30, or is this going to be the only one? If it's the only one, go ahead. Vincent On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Le lundi 18 janvier 2010, à 15:07 +0530, Johnny Jacob a écrit

Re: Raising external dependency on System Tools Backends

2010-01-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 12 janvier 2010, à 14:58 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit : Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 12:13 +0100 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat: OK to raise the dependency on the wiki? I'd also need somebody to update the jhbuild modulesets. I don't see any reasons against, especially after you've

Re: gnome-packagekit external deps

2009-12-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 08 décembre 2009, à 10:44 +, Richard Hughes a écrit : To fix some bugs, I've raised the gnome-packagekit dep on PackageKit to 0.5.5. I'm asking for retrospective permission to do so as I've been poked by a couple of people now. In 2.28.x or 2.29.x? PackageKit 0.5.5 was released

Re: gnome-packagekit external deps

2009-12-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 08 décembre 2009, à 11:21 +, Richard Hughes a écrit : 2009/12/8 Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org: In 2.28.x or 2.29.x? Just 2.29, 2.28 will continue to work with really old versions of PackageKit (although important bugs are fixed if you use newer versions) So let's do it another

Re: Advice requested on deprecating AT-SPI/CORBA

2009-12-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Hey, Le mercredi 21 octobre 2009, à 12:57 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : Hi All: We're slated to have the AT-SPI/D-Bus stuff in place for 2.29.2. Things are chugging away and looking positive. I have some questions about some approaches we are going to take and would like some opinions

Re: Advice requested on deprecating AT-SPI/CORBA

2009-12-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 02 décembre 2009, à 09:57 -0500, Willie Walker a écrit : As a potential solution, we can modify the AT-SPI/CORBA *.desktop file to key off of a new gconf key, /desktop/gnome/interface/at-spi-corba. The existing /desktop/gnome/interface/accessibility key will be used everywhere

Re: Branch notifications

2009-11-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 20 novembre 2009, à 15:03 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit : From http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner When you branch, please remember to let release-team, desktop-devel-list, gnome-doc-list, and gnome-i18n know. Since the git migration, we have automatic notifications for

Re: External Dependency Proposal: GtkImageView

2009-11-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le dimanche 08 novembre 2009, à 02:16 -0500, Matthew Barnes a écrit : I'd like to use Björn Lindqvist's GtkImageView widget [1] in Evolution for displaying image attachments inline. Evolution has been displaying image attachments inline on its own for ages, but GtkImageView does it

Re: Adding a dependency to libchamplain

2009-11-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi Pierre-Luc, Le mardi 27 octobre 2009, à 11:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin a écrit : Hi, I am slightly late for this but we'd like to add a dependency to libchamplain in the 0.6 cycle (which corresponds to 2.29/2.30 timeframe). Since libchamplain is an external dep, you could actually do

Re: Appearance properties

2009-11-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 10 novembre 2009, à 12:02 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Frederic Crozat There's plenty of announcements of changes, every day, over there: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/svn-commits-list/ Matthias, this is not a fair answer. It's a fact that

Re: GNOME 3.0 in September 2010

2009-11-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 09 novembre 2009, à 22:35 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit : Thanks to the input from the community, we were able to draw a clear picture of where we stand today and where we will be next March. We didn't want to detail the feedback we got from the various teams in the announcement

Re: Module proposal: dconf

2009-10-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009, à 00:16 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo a écrit : El lun, 12-10-2009 a las 11:33 -0400, Ryan Lortie escribió: Hello On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:30 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le lundi 12 octobre 2009, à 11:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : I'd like to propose

Re: Module proposal: dconf

2009-10-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 12 octobre 2009, à 11:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : Hello dconf is a very conceptually simple key/value storage system with an implementation that makes it extremely efficient. There have been 3 tarball releases so far: 0.1, 0.1.1, 0.2. More will be following in the coming

Re: External Dependency Proposal: Berkeley DB (libdb)

2009-10-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009, à 11:13 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit : For years now, evolution-data-server has been dragging around its own copy of Berkeley DB (libdb) 4.1.25. As I understand the back story, it was originally added to work around libdb's frequently changing on-disk database

Re: Bump minimum version of poppler to 0.12.0

2009-09-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009, à 11:06 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos a écrit : Poppler 0.12 is the new stable release. Although it doesn't add any new API and evince builds with earlier versions, I suggest to bump the minimum version because this release includes a lot of important rendering and

Re: Would this be a break?

2009-09-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 12 septembre 2009, à 13:27 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : Philippe Rouquier wrote: I just got a patch today that add a minor feature to brasero (see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594954). Once applied the patch allow brasero to emit a sound. the code is quite

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-09-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 18:51 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 17:47 +0100, Martyn Russell a écrit : On 18/08/09 17:44, Lennart Poettering wrote: I don't think it would be a good idea to use GNOME solely as a vehicle to make things more popular with other

Re: Decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menu

2009-09-07 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 07 septembre 2009, à 12:25 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis a écrit : Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus (Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder scale discussion about it? The icons for categories in the applications menu are back, which

Re: Application names

2009-08-25 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 16:06 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : The guidelines are: - If Name is just the application name, leave it alone - If there is no GenericName, leave it alone - If Name == GenericName: remove GenericName - If Name embeds both the application name and the generic

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-08-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit : We'll do our best and are committed to formulate our answers in a non-vague way and improve the communication of the project's members, about the project, towards the community. Maybe just clearly state what tracker (or

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-08-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:26 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit : We'll do our best and are committed to formulate our answers in a non-vague way and improve the communication of the project's members, about the project, towards

Re: Bumping/Dropping the PolicyKit external dep

2009-08-14 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 14 août 2009, à 11:59 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : Matthias Clasen wrote: We should make a decision to bump our PolicyKit dependency to 0.92 for Gnome 2.28. Curiously, this effectively drops PolicyKit as an external dependency (except for the few mechanisms that are

Re: Application names

2009-08-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 08 août 2009, à 17:51 -0400, William Jon McCann a écrit : On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Frederic Petersfpet...@gnome.org wrote: However for compatibility reasons, I have been interested by Colin Walters comments:  | If we change the Name field now, concretely it will be a huge

Re: Application names

2009-08-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 10 août 2009, à 09:03 -0400, William Jon McCann a écrit : On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Vincent Untzvu...@gnome.org wrote: [need to think about your answer to the first question]  + translators have stated that it's wrong to do Name - GenericName   programmatically. So, hrm, why

Re: Propose new modules for inclusion in GNOME 2.30/3.0

2009-08-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 10 août 2009, à 16:45 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit : Tonight at 23:59 UTC the period for proposing new modules for official inclusion in GNOME starts. [...] The new modules proposal period will end on Monday Oct 26th at 23:59 UTC. We expect discussion to heat up about those

Re: GNOME Menus restructuring

2009-07-29 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 28 juillet 2009, à 13:04 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : We have done essentially this (with the extra Preferences menu in between) for a few releases in Fedora, and we have gone back to using a single Preferences menu by default now. The two main problems we faced with this are

Re: Trying a new toolbar style

2009-07-29 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mercredi 29 juillet 2009, à 14:38 +0100, Thomas Wood a écrit : PLEASE TRY THIS OPTION BEFORE YOU COMMENT - A LOT OF PEOPLE DO NOT REALISE THAT ONLY SOME TOOLBAR BUTTONS GET LABELS IN THIS MODE. Heh ;-) (I like this style, btw) Therefore, I would like to propose a trial period with

pessulus branched for 2.26

2009-07-28 Thread Vincent Untz
pessulus now has gnome-2-26 branch. Vincent Le mardi 28 juillet 2009, à 17:46 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le mardi 28 juillet 2009, à 15:43 -, GNOME Status Pages a écrit : This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been

Re: 2.6.31 kernel requirements for gnome-bluetooth

2009-07-28 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 27 juillet 2009, à 18:06 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : If /dev/rfkill support isn't present, you just won't be able to enable/disable Bluetooth through the menus/preferences. So, to clarify: 2.6.31 kernel is a runtime dependency for a specific feature and everything else works fine

Re: GNOME and non-linux platforms (release team please stand up)

2009-07-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 juillet 2009, à 15:47 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : AFAIK, we only depend on stuff where it's possible to have a backend on non-linux platforms. As Lennart mentioned, it's the case with PA. As Andre explains, it's also the case for DK. Are there cases where this is not true? Ah

Re: libwnck: Offering help

2009-07-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mardi 14 juillet 2009, à 20:34 +0200, Marcus Carlson a écrit : Hi maintainers of libwnck (and gnome-panel)! I've been browsing around the bugs of libwnck, also submitted a few patches [1], and what I can see it don't get a lot of attention. So I would like to help out (but with

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le lundi 22 juin 2009, à 13:30 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit : FWIW, Matthias done a great job both porting apps as well as creating / maintaining this page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PolicyKitOne which is useful for both distributors and the GNOME project itself. I

Re: WebKitGTK+ as an external dependency

2009-06-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 20:22 +0300, Xan Lopez a écrit : On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Joanmarie Diggs joanmarie.di...@gmail.com wrote: Right now, my answer is gosh, I sure hope so. :-) Admittedly, not as good as a heck yes!, but better than no. Where things stand as of today

Re: WebKitGTK+ as an external dependency

2009-06-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 15 juin 2009, à 14:44 -0400, Joanmarie Diggs a écrit : On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:53 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: [...] In any case let's try to do our best here, and in a few more weeks I'm sure we'll have a clearer picture of where we'll stand by 2.28. So a few more weeks

gnome-{desktop,menus,panel,session}, libgweather and libwnck branched for 2.26

2009-06-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, I just branched gnome-{desktop,menus,panel,session}, libgweather and libwnck for 2.26, with the usual gnome-2-26 name. Note to translators: the gnome-panel branch doesn't contain the string freeze break. I also had to mark some strings as fuzzy to pass the post-commit check for po files.

Re: List translators script

2009-05-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 18 mai 2009, à 23:01 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : i have also working list_translators.sh here, which i enhanced to my needs. please find it attached. You're missing -- $1 in diff_files. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.26.2 Stable Release

2009-05-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 15 mai 2009, à 15:53 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : On 05/15/2009 03:37 PM, Vincent Untz wrote: Hi, Oopsie. Looks like the magic reminder mail that was supposed to be sent to the release team wasn't sent :-) But we noticed it, and more surprisingly, we noticed it before Monday

Re: New Module Proposal. libseed

2009-05-14 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 14 mai 2009, à 01:11 -0400, Robert Carr a écrit : I've started the gnome-js-common module tonight and pushed it to GIT (just lang.js signals.js and tweener), and by the next Seed release (2 weeks again...) intend to move a lot of the Seed modules and tests there. Just want to say:

Re: New Module Proposal. libseed

2009-05-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 12 mai 2009, à 18:18 -0700, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : I agree with Hubert that sending mixed messages about browser/js engines is not a good idea. FWIW, this is more or less the feeling that the release team had when it was proposed for 2.26. I think it's pretty clear by now that

Re: Bump minimum version of poppler to 0.11.0

2009-05-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 12 mai 2009, à 12:40 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: Poppler 0.11.0 has just been released. It's the first unstable release leading up to 0.12. It includes the new API needed to add support for annotations in Evince. Any objection? I had a

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the distributions will not loose their patches. I think this summarize well the whole thing: we do

Re: WebKitGTK+ as an external dependency

2009-05-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le lundi 04 mai 2009, à 14:50 +0300, Xan Lopez a écrit : Hello, the aim of the Epiphany team is to make 2.28 our first WebKit release. For this to happen we need to replace our external dependency on Gecko with WebKitGTK+, so consider this a request to do so. In the post 2.26 module

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 01:51 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: [...] what is the point of having 'project' in the

Re: WebKitGTK+ as an external dependency

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 04 mai 2009, à 20:58 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit : Could be also good have a minimal feedback from distro packagers. I suppose that even though all relevant GNOME Desktop modules will be switched to WebKitGtk, distros will continue to provide Firefox as standard browser. So Fedora or

Re: gnome-games requires clutter 0.9.x

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 11:02 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : also, using clutter-0.9.2 is strongly discouraged; you should be using git. this is quite like using glib and gtk+ from the master branch during the development cycle. Hrm, then what's the point of the development tarballs? :-)

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 00:48 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Robin Sonefors ozam...@flukkost.nu wrote: On tis, 2009-05-05 at 23:10 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: Imagine someone who has been on a GNOME hiatus or is a new comer. What would be easier

Re: git and trailing whitespace

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 23:00 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : Heya! Trailing whitespace sucks. git is only half as much fun when people have trailing whitespace in their code. diffs get cluttered up by changes that actually aren't changes. Many other project these days enforce pretty

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:01 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : You don't need a branch to make commits, tag them and push them. $ git checkout PANGO_1_2_4 # make changes $ git commit -a $ git tag PANGO_1_2_5 $ git push origin PANGO_1_2_5 But if you feel icky about not working on a

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:24 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: No. It points to the latest code in the 2.24 branch. There might be code after the release. It's a branch, it's not a tag. So, maybe I don't understand what

Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?

2009-04-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 10:50 -0500, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? Didn't see a lot of replies, but I think it makes sense. Any other opinion? Vincent -- Les

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 16:46 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : We can copy paste it to http://live.gnome.org/Git/CommitMessages if people agree. I created this, with a few changes: + removed mention of --signoff + add tag on first line of commit message (as suggested by Behdad) + mention

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 07:55 -0700, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : I agree. And either Git/Developers should be expanded to include all these details, or its commit message section should link to Git/CommitMessages. I changed the section to link to Git/CommitMessages. Vincent -- Les gens

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 23 avril 2009, à 15:42 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : On 04/23/2009 08:47 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009, Vincent Untz wrote: Frédéric (fredp) is suggesting to also propose a standard scheme to reference bugs that are fixed by a commit (so we can script things if it's

Re: intltool move

2009-04-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 19 avril 2009, à 15:25 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit : The intltool product on bugzilla.gnome.org is now closed for new reports, and the SVN module was moved over to svn-archive before the gnome.org transition to git. The latest intltool code is already in a bzr branch on Launchpad

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >