Re: New Module Proposal. libseed

2009-05-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 12 mai 2009, à 18:18 -0700, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : > I agree with Hubert that sending mixed messages about browser/js > engines is not a good idea. FWIW, this is more or less the feeling that the release team had when it was proposed for 2.26. I think it's pretty clear by now that the

Re: Bump minimum version of poppler to 0.11.0

2009-05-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 12 mai 2009, à 12:40 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: > > > Poppler 0.11.0 has just been released. It's the first "unstable" release > > leading up to 0.12. It includes the new API needed to add support for > > annotations in Evince. > > > > Any objection?

Re: WebKitGTK+ as an external dependency

2009-05-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le lundi 04 mai 2009, à 14:50 +0300, Xan Lopez a écrit : > Hello, > > the aim of the Epiphany team is to make 2.28 our first WebKit release. > For this to happen we need to replace our external dependency on Gecko > with WebKitGTK+, so consider this a request to do so. > > In the post 2.26 m

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : > Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make > debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the > distributions will not loose their patches. I think this summarize well the whole thing: we do

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:24 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: > > No. It points to the latest code in the 2.24 branch. There might be code > > after the release. It's a branch, it's not a tag. So, maybe I don

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:01 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : > You don't need a branch to make commits, tag them and push them. > > $ git checkout PANGO_1_2_4 > # make changes > $ git commit -a > $ git tag PANGO_1_2_5 > $ git push origin PANGO_1_2_5 > > But if you feel icky about not workin

Re: git and trailing whitespace

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 23:00 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > Heya! > > Trailing whitespace sucks. git is only half as much fun when people > have trailing whitespace in their code. diffs get cluttered up by > changes that actually aren't changes. > > Many other project these days enforce

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 00:48 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Robin Sonefors wrote: > > On tis, 2009-05-05 at 23:10 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> > >> Imagine someone who has been on a GNOME hiatus or is a new comer. What > >> would be easier to unders

Re: gnome-games requires clutter 0.9.x

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 11:02 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > also, using clutter-0.9.2 is strongly discouraged; you should be using > git. > > this is quite like using glib and gtk+ from the master branch during the > development cycle. Hrm, then what's the point of the development tarballs?

Re: WebKitGTK+ as an external dependency

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 04 mai 2009, à 20:58 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit : > Could be also good have a minimal feedback from distro packagers. I > suppose that even though all relevant GNOME Desktop modules will be > switched to WebKitGtk, distros will continue to provide Firefox as > standard browser. So Fedora

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 01:51 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau > wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Felipe Contreras > > wrote: > >> [...] what is the point of having 'project' in the branch > >> name? Branches are per-repos

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 07:55 -0700, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : > I agree. And either Git/Developers should be expanded to include all > these details, or its commit message section should link to > Git/CommitMessages. I changed the section to link to Git/CommitMessages. Vincent -- Les gen

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 16:46 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > We can copy & paste it to http://live.gnome.org/Git/CommitMessages if > people agree. I created this, with a few changes: + removed mention of --signoff + add tag on first line of commit message (as suggested

Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?

2009-04-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 10:50 -0500, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : > With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting > inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? Didn't see a lot of replies, but I think it makes sense. Any other opinion? Vincent -- Les

Re: intltool move

2009-04-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 19 avril 2009, à 15:25 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit : > The intltool product on bugzilla.gnome.org is now closed for new > reports, and the SVN module was moved over to svn-archive before the > gnome.org transition to git. The latest intltool code is already in a > bzr branch on Launchpa

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 23 avril 2009, à 15:42 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > On 04/23/2009 08:47 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009, Vincent Untz wrote: >>> Frédéric (fredp) is suggesting to also propose a standard scheme to >>> reference bugs that are fixed by a comm

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 16:46 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hey, > > The GTK+ team documented how they'd like to see the git commit messages > in http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+/tree/README.commits > > = copy & paste = &

Re: Generating .gitignore files

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 21:51 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > Hi, > > Based on an idea from halfline, I hacked a few lines to automatically > generate .gitignore from Makefile.am. It grew to a couple hundred lines, > and is available from pango/git.mk. [...] > Bug reports, enhancements

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 15:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:47 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > > > Hey, > > > > > > I first wrote Makefile.am magic for

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > Hey, > > I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git > on demand. Those macros have been modified and gathered in > http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog to only generate ChangeLog for "make > dist"

git commit messages

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Hey, The GTK+ team documented how they'd like to see the git commit messages in http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+/tree/README.commits = copy & paste = The expected format for git commit messages is as follows: === begin example commit === Short explanation o

Re: Adding module descriptions

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 20:55 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : > The point is deps are not changed at random, the person merging code > changes is the best person to update build deps. This is unfortunately > not something you can always find in ChangeLog/NEWS. What about reminding maintainer

Re: Adding module descriptions

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 11:46 -0400, Owen Taylor a écrit : > B) Drop MAINTAINERS and move the information to the DOAP file. > (There would be some sort of transition period where we would > support both.) > > I like B) better; I'd rather one file than a collection of little files.

Re: How to remove remote branch with git?

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 22:28 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: > > > I just did my first commit with git (Yay!!). However I first made a > > mistake and made a new remote branch called jaap in the cheese > > project. > > I now want to remove that branch because it was a

Re: Bumping required version of DeviceKit-power to 007

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 10:03 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit : > Can I bump the external dependencies version of DeviceKit-power from 006 > to 007 for 2.27.x please? 007 was released a few weeks ago, and fixes > many bugs I don't want to work around in gnome-power-manager anymore. Sounds good. P

Re: dconf

2009-04-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 11:37 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : > Ideally, I'd like to see GNOME using GSettings for 3.0. Rob Taylor (my > boss) has indicated that I will definitely be able to spend time > addressing issues that may arise with dconf and GSettings in the lead-up > to 3.0. Just

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mercredi 08 avril 2009, à 23:27 -0700, Dave Neary a écrit : > I'm not sure what can be done about it now, but at least, it might be > useful if release team discussions on this subject were published for > review, I think. I can think of only one private mail discussion about this (althoug

Re: GNOME 3.0 Schedule draft; Streamlining of the Platform.

2009-04-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 11:26 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : > 2) We are working with another organization right now to investigate > magnification solutions. This may involve picking up on > http://projects.gnome.org/outreach/a11y/tasks/magnification/, and I > suspect the ultimate solutio

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 11:44 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : > For developers local to the Boston area, I'm happy to take a visit to > your sight to go over accessibility considerations and to discuss your > new UI's with you from an accessibility standpoint. I promise to focus > sole

Re: dconf

2009-04-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 12:31 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : > One thing that dconf is missing that GConf gives you, however, is > schemas. You could get this by using dconf as a backend from the gconf > daemon. It seems like this is sort of missing the point, though. [...] > This is honest

Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-02 Thread Vincent Untz
During the first few months of 2008, a few Release Team members discussed here and there about the state of GNOME. This was nothing official, and it could actually have been considered as some friends talking together about things they deeply care about. There were thoughts that GNOME could stay wi

Re: bug-buddy integration

2009-03-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 20 mars 2009, à 16:15 +, Matt Keenan a écrit : > Slight side topic question here... > > for gnome 2.24, GTK_MODULES was set to include "gnomebreakpad" on session > login > depending on whether /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modeules/libgnomebreakpad.so existed or > now. > > Removing gnomebreakp

Re: TARBALLS DUE (before Monday 23:59 UTC!, don't forget translators!): GNOME 2.26.0 Final Release

2009-03-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 14 mars 2009, à 10:39 -0400, Robert Macewan a écrit : > Vincent, > You're 404'ing with linkage to > http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.26.0/ The mail said "We will publish jhbuild modulesets on Tuesday". We're not Tuesday yet :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

Yes, you can help with session saving!

2009-03-14 Thread Vincent Untz
Dear friends, We have a nearly-working implemention of session saving in trunk at the moment (thanks to efforts from Lucas!). However, a bunch of small bugs makes it not good enough for real use. I put a patch in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552387 that should make things work reason

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GPointingDeviceSettings-1.0.0

2009-03-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le dimanche 08 mars 2009, à 20:08 +0900, Hiroyuki Ikezoe a écrit : > Hello everyone, > > GPointingDeviceSettings-1.0.0 has been released. > > GPointingDeviceSettings is a new GUI tool for setting various pointing > devices. Each UI can be written as dynamic loadable module, so a third > part

Modules needing a release for 2.26.0

2009-03-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, Here's a list of modules that didn't see a release since quite some time. It'd be nice to be sure that they either had no change at all, or that someone rolls a tarball for 2.26.0 in 10 days. Note that if there's no news for a module before March 16th, the release team will roll tarballs

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 23:03 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee a écrit : > There is no way to find out who is actually using the Python (or whatever > language) bindings for a given library. Some may have custom applications > around, and just dropping support while the underlying library is not > offi

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 20:31 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > >> We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. > >> Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I > >> believe. >

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit : > Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform? We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I believe. >

Re: Help with strings for "solution" for desktop file "virus" problem

2009-02-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 20 février 2009, à 15:21 +, Alexander Larsson a écrit : > So, there has been a lot of attention on the internets recently about > the the desktop file "virus" issue. /me hadn't noticed. But there were a few threads on xdg about it. Might be worth to propose the solution there, so t

Re: quo vadis, docs

2009-02-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 17 février 2009, à 07:46 +, Phil Bull a écrit : > Hi Vincent, > > On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 00:45 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > This could be possible if we have enough mentors. And from what I > > understood from Shaun, this is part of the issue. Note that I don

Re: quo vadis, docs

2009-02-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 16 février 2009, à 23:41 +0100, Christian Kirbach a écrit : > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:52:55 +0100, Diego Escalante Urrelo > wrote: > >> On 2/10/09, Gil Forcada wrote: >>> >>> Stormy is asking for ideas and topics for spend the advisory fundings, >>> so why not propose a hackfest-like m

Re: gnome-doc-utils, automake 1.9, and -Wno-portability

2009-02-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 15 février 2009, à 16:21 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit : > It seems to me that, if we just require GNU make, we ought to > just pass -Wno-portability to automake. Makes sense to me. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ deskt

Re: gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs moved to git

2009-02-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 12 février 2009, à 09:54 +1300, John Stowers a écrit : > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote: > > gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git. > > The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode. > > Does this mean the

Re: New Desktop Testing team

2009-02-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 10 février 2009, à 15:13 +0100, Ara Pulido a écrit : > It was announced in the gnome-announce-list. For future reference: announcements like this are 100% appropriate for devel-announce-list too ;-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. __

Re: Nautilus drop-down menu with view type

2009-02-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 08 février 2009, à 07:26 -0800, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : > (You forgot to CC the list, so I'm CCing my response) > > On 02/08/2009 02:41 AM, Matteo Settenvini wrote: >> On sab, 2009-02-07 at 15:25 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote: >>> Also, where is this drop-down menu with the view type?

Re: python-gmenu and multiple languages

2009-02-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le samedi 07 février 2009, à 15:20 -0600, miket a écrit : > Hello, > > Hoping this is the right place for python-gmenu questions... it seemed > to be the only associated mailing list I could find. I've figured out > how to use the python bindings to navigate the menu system, but when I > get

pessulus branched for GNOME 2.24

2009-01-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, I've branched pessulus for GNOME 2.24 so I can add a small error dialog with new strings in trunk. Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 19 janvier 2009, à 11:30 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : > Wouldn't it be easier to convert the old applet to also use a tray > icon? This way no useless applet needs to stay in the memory (due to > the fact applets have no programmatical way to add or remove > themselves at run time). O

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009, à 12:25 +, Luis Medinas a écrit : > Right now Brasero is currently re-licensing the library again, we > already contacted the people involved asking about the change. There > were some bits in the library that Philippe re-wrote (that used NCB > code) to be compatibl

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009, à 10:59 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 19:18 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > > > - Split Brasero into a library (available on trunk) named > > > libbrasero-media that is being documented (devhelp) and re-arranged so > > > we can deliver a

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009, à 10:54 +0100, Frederic Crozat a écrit : > Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 04:39 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > > On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 00:10 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > Ahoj, > > > > > > a reminder that module inclusion discussion must heat up now. > > > At Janua

Re: GNOME 2.25.4 released!

2009-01-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 08 janvier 2009, à 12:48 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > Hi! > > > Once again: the NEWS script only looks for diffs from the previous > > release of *the same MAJOR.MINOR line*. As there was no previous > > 2.25.* anjuta release, there is nothing to diff against. > > But that would me

Re: New Module Proposal: libseed

2009-01-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 05 janvier 2009, à 22:12 -0500, Robert Carr a écrit : > I was not planning to do this until .28, however a nice Clutter game > written in Seed was merged in to gnome-games today, and there is some > interest in being able to include this in .26. > > I would like to propose Seed (http://li

Re: ekiga 3.1.0

2009-01-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 06 janvier 2009, à 14:43 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Damien Sandras released : > > >Module: ekiga > > Version: 3.1.0 > > It requires newer versions of ptlib (2.5.2) and opal (3.5.2); no > objection bumping those external dependencies ? I vote for automatically bumpi

Re: Cleaning libegg

2008-12-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 11 décembre 2008, à 23:39 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi, > > Every now and then, there's someone sending a patch for something in > libegg that shouldn't be used anymore. I think it makes sense to remove > the code from libegg that has been integrated i

Re: Hosting app binaries at download.gnome.org?

2008-12-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 décembre 2008, à 07:46 -0800, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm wondering where I should be putting my Tomboy binaries for > Windows/Mac. I'd like to have them in the same place where source > tarballs are downloaded [1], but I don't know how to do that or even if > it i

Re: Eel merged into Nautilus 2.25.3

2008-12-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008, à 13:30 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > The one thing I found in Fedora that really uses eel in a substantial way is > a program called gnome-translate. I guess they're in for a bunch of > porting work. Nod. But we don't have to ship eel anymore in the desktop suite -

Re: Eel merged into Nautilus 2.25.3

2008-12-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 15 décembre 2008, à 21:05 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > I just released Nautilus 2.25.3 which contains an internalized copy of > > eel, and I don't plan to do any more eel releases. This lets the > > compiler do better optimizations and means one less l

Re: Bump gtk-vnc dependency

2008-12-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 16 décembre 2008, à 10:53 -0300, Jonh Wendell a écrit : > Hello, folks. > > I want to update vinagre dependency on gtk-vnc to 0.3.8, which was > released last week. > > This is important because, besides the usual fixes, it allows scaling > based on cairo, and not gtkGlExt anymore. In or

Re: Move intltool to External Deps from Dev Platform

2008-12-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 15 décembre 2008, à 09:48 -0500, Rodney Dawes a écrit : > Hi, > > I would like to propose that we remove intltool from the Developer > Platform module set, and place it in External Dependencies. As > intltool is a build tool, rather than a library, and is meant to > be useful outside the

Re: Cleaning libegg

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 11 décembre 2008, à 18:05 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > Vincent Untz wrote: > > > Keeping: > > > > + md5 > > GChecksum? Ah, I was sure it was integrated in glib but I couldn't find the API. Thanks :-) Vincent -- L

Cleaning libegg

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Every now and then, there's someone sending a patch for something in libegg that shouldn't be used anymore. I think it makes sense to remove the code from libegg that has been integrated in other libraries so that people don't lose time doing this, and also to avoid people using this old code.

Re: Proposal for GNOME Goal: msgctxt migration

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 18 novembre 2008, à 17:27 +0100, Christian Rose a écrit : > Hi, > > Quite some people already are implementing this goal. > > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/MsgctxtMigration FWIW, I updated the instructions a bit to mention the case of NC_() which needs a call to g_dpgettext2() at run

Re: [Libgnome-menu2] Any quick way to check which part of the tree is updated?

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 13 novembre 2008, à 10:23 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : > >http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452375 > > > >Vincent > > I noticed that this bug is opened 15 months ago, is there any progress > or plan on this by now :) > > Also I don't know is there anyone else doing this work now

Re: Reduced Bugzilla functionality for 6+ months -- acceptable?

2008-12-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, à 12:56 -0500, Colin Walters a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Cosimo Cecchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - simple-dup-finder > > Suggest we move crashes out of Bugzilla and into a separate database > (like Socorro). Bugzilla should only be for hand-written

Re: Reduced Bugzilla functionality for 6+ months -- acceptable?

2008-12-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, à 17:00 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit : > Is above acceptable? The current situation is a dead-end, so I'm all for moving, even if we lose some stuff. We'll eventually reimplement stuff that is important to us, and hopefully, we'll be able to do it in a more upstream-frie

Re: libxklavier: request for the minimum version change

2008-11-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 30 novembre 2008, à 22:00 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > > Does anybody mind changing the minimum version of libxklavier (in > > deps) - to 3.8? Only g-s-d is affected, new signal is introduced (for > > the keyboard hotplugging). > > It's okay for me; I

Re: Bump telepathy-glib version to 0.7.15

2008-11-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 30 novembre 2008, à 22:05 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : > I wrote: > > > Just like libxklavier, I will update jhbuild modulesets on second > > approval notice, so we get correct external dependencies for 2.25.2. > > Actually jhbuild moduleset does have 0.7.17 already, I should have

Re: Language code to language name mapping

2008-11-26 Thread Vincent Untz
Hey, Le mercredi 26 novembre 2008, à 16:27 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > My question right now is, how do applications (intlclock, etc...) do that > currently? And how do people think it should be done. intlclock doesn't use iso-codes :-) Looking at totem: it parses the iso-codes xml. See t

gnome-session branched for GNOME 2.24, from an old revision

2008-11-25 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, I've branched gnome-session for GNOME 2.24. The branch name is the usual gnome-2-24. Note that there was some changes that were not for 2.24 in trunk, so I had to branch from revision 5150. This means that one translation (sv) has been updated in trunk but not in gnome-2-24. Daniel, I apo

gnome-{menus,panel} & lib{wnck,gweather} branched for GNOME 2.24

2008-11-25 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, gnome-menus, gnome-panel, libwnck and libgweather have been branched for GNOME 2.24. The branch name is the usual gnome-2-24. Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnom

Re: External dependencies, DeviceKit-power and GNOME Power Manager

2008-11-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 24 novembre 2008, à 18:25 +, Richard Hughes a écrit : > Q: Is anything else going to use DeviceKit-$foo? > A: In the future gvfs will depend on DeviceKit-disks, not HAL Does it sound possible to port all GNOME away from hal to DeviceKit-$foo in the 2.26 timeframe? Vincent -- Les ge

Re: DVCS

2008-11-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 17 novembre 2008, à 17:56 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > Owen Taylor wrote: > > Question for gnome-infrastructure: How do we move forward on it? Do we > > have an easier alternative at hand then just writing low-tech one off > > application? > > I was thinking that we can either use

Re: Is this a UI freeze break?

2008-11-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 17 novembre 2008, à 15:01 -0500, Matthew Barnes a écrit : > I fixed a bug in Evolution's infamous ETable widget that makes header > labels left-aligned instead of center-aligned for better consistency > with GtkTreeView. It was well received and I was told to ask whether > this kind of ch

Re: [Libgnome-menu2] Any quick way to check which part of the tree is updated?

2008-11-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 12 novembre 2008, à 14:30 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : > Hi > I quickly browse through the source code of libgnome-menu2, and I read > some of the app code who using this library. > > I can see that when tree is changed, With the data we got from the call > back function

Re: Any doc or sample code for using Libgnome-menu2 ?

2008-11-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 11 novembre 2008, à 09:46 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : > By the way, is there any other sample code or api doc available? 8 ) Hrm, there's no API documentation, that's quite bad :/ As for sample code, there's some code in gnome-panel using it. That being said, you can get a pretty good

Re: how gnome panel handle submenu and app's show/non-show information?

2008-11-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008, à 18:25 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : > Hi > > My system is ubuntu 8.04 > I check the /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu, I can see that not all the > submenu is actually show in the gnome-panel > And also not all the app is show in each submenu or category. > I can see t

Re: Any doc or sample code for using Libgnome-menu2 ?

2008-11-10 Thread Vincent Untz
initialization assertion > failed, use IA__g_type_init() prior to this function Which version of gnome-menus is this? It should have been fixed with: 2008-04-11 Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] * libmenu/menu-monitor.c: (register_monitor): call g_type_init() once si

Re: GNOME 2.25.1 Released!

2008-11-07 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 07 novembre 2008, à 09:40 -0600, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : > Why was Gnome Games omitted from the release notes? This was the worst > possible release that could have been left out. There are more changes in > dependencies and packaging in this release than any other point in my recent

Re: Proposed external dependency: WebKit/GTK+

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 17:58 +0100, Richard Hult a écrit : > Was there a conclusion on this at some point? I can't find anything in > the archives. It would be great to be able to depend on it since I have > some improvements in Devhelp trunk which needs WebKit. It was not ready for 2.24

Re: new module proposal: notification-daemon+libnotify

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 10:57 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I don't know how busy Christian is. > > But even if he is too busy to propose the module himself, I think it > is time for us to be honest about the fact that it is pretty much > impossible to use the desktop without notificatio

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008, à 10:30 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : > Hi, > > I'd like to propose libproxy (LGPL 2.1+; > http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/) as a blessed external dependency for > GNOME 2.26. libproxy is currently used by vlc and neon and libsoup and > webkit are considerin

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 14:32 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if the connection works in both cases, but the results are > > different? I would guess it's up to the application to

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 07:59 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : > Vincent Untz wrote: >> Le mardi 21 octobre 2008, à 10:30 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to propose libproxy (LGPL 2.1+; >>> h

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008, à 10:30 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : > Hi, > > I'd like to propose libproxy (LGPL 2.1+; > http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/) as a blessed external dependency for > GNOME 2.26. libproxy is currently used by vlc and neon and libsoup and > webkit are considerin

Re: libunique external dependency for 2.25?

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008, à 23:23 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > while the ultimate goal *is* to have this functionality inside gtk+ I'm > nowhere near having the time to integrate it myself - not in the way I > want it integrated[1], at the very least. > > another issue is that libunique

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008, à 14:53 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > Heya, > > I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26. Same comments as the ones I did for brasero :-) Please add gnome-user-share to the list at the top of http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop and

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 01 novembre 2008, à 19:27 +0100, Philippe Rouquier a écrit : > Hi, > > We'd be interested in having brasero integrated into the GNOME desktop. Please add brasero to the list at the top of http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop and also add it to gnome-suites-2.26.modules (belo

Re: Cleanup tasks

2008-11-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 03 novembre 2008, à 13:24 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > - Continue the "degnomification" that is already off to a good start: > > http://live.gnome.org/LibgnomeMustDie > > We recently did this for gnome-settings-daemon, but it didn't help [1], > because lib

Re: Prototyping the next generation panel?

2008-10-28 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 27 octobre 2008, à 16:58 -0700, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > Hi! > > So after I finally got to read > http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore and > vuntz blogpost I was wondering if there is already a place where the > prototyping of the new panel is happening.

Re: Prototyping the next generation panel?

2008-10-28 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008, à 15:20 +, Karl Lattimer a écrit : > Columbiad - the cannon from the book "From earth to the moon" ? Interesting -- I had the same proposal :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list maili

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by > default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user > installing a server wants it to be started. From what I read of > Patryk, PLD Linux also star

Re: Testing dark themes and marking deprecated widgets

2008-10-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 15:19 +0200, Andrea Cimitan a écrit : > 2008/9/30 Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I like the idea. But I would guess distros would patch this out :/ Maybe > > we can do some opt-in thing, with a gconf key or a file somewhere in > > $

Re: libunique external dependency for 2.25?

2008-10-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 01 octobre 2008, à 14:51 +0200, Alexander Larsson a écrit : > I just commited some nautilus code to trunk (for 2.25) that makes use of > libunique for unique application functionallity (replacing the previous > code using bonobo-activation). > > However, libunique isn't currently a bl

Re: Testing dark themes and marking deprecated widgets

2008-09-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 17:58 +0200, Benjamin Berg a écrit : > On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 12:54 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 12:31 +0200, Benjamin Berg a écrit : > > > Do you think that exposing deprecated widgets and theme related bugs > &g

Re: Testing dark themes and marking deprecated widgets

2008-09-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 12:31 +0200, Benjamin Berg a écrit : > Hello, > > There have been ideas to improve the desktop by modifying the themes to > show problems in application. Specifically I am proposing to use a dark > colour scheme for Clearlooks during the next unstable release cycle. >

Modules with no stable release for 2.24.0

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Here's a quick list of modules that seem to still only have an unstable release. If you want someone to release a tarball for you, please reply. evolution-webcal 2.23.91 gconf-editor 2.23.91 gnome-backgrounds 2.23.92 gnome-control-center 2.23.90 gnome-icon-theme 2

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 16:56 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > And I've created patches for quite some modules: > http://tmp.vuntz.net/adjustpatches/ > > accerciser.patch > anjuta.patch > dasher.patch > deskbar-applet.patch > eog.patch > evo

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 16:50 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 12:24 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : > >> Can we request a global freeze break permiss

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >