Re: Offtopic: Git workflow with external repository and git.gnome.org

2014-04-16 Thread jose.ali...@gmail.com
Hi, to add to what Germán said, the key point is that one local repository can have several branches, and each of this branches can have a different upstream repository. So you would clone bugzilla's git repo. Then, in a different branch (say, gnome-integration) you would apply your patches, then y

Re: Preserved Window Placement

2012-11-12 Thread jose.ali...@gmail.com
Hi, On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Federico Mena Quintero < > feder...@gnome.org> wrote: > >> >> Disclaimer/introduction: In the past I've said that saving window >> geometries is the job of the window manager and shouldn't be done by

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v6)

2011-10-20 Thread jose.ali...@gmail.com
Hi, On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 05:15:37PM +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: >> Provocative question: is there any way that some unbiased survey would >> change the emphasis of development from gnome-shell to the fallback mode? >> And increase the co

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v2)

2011-08-01 Thread jose.ali...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Felipe Contreras < felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > After going through all the feedback, here's the second version of the > proposed survey. > > There is a proposal to delay the survey until 3.2 is released, to try > to avoid some of the initial negati

Re: Gnome Feature Request

2011-05-09 Thread jose.ali...@gmail.com
Hi, Please see comments inline. 2011/5/8 Erick Pérez : > On 08/05/2011, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> 2011/5/8 Erick Pérez >> >>> > Why not at the time of the menu? >>> Cause it will be to slow, way to slow. Making choices based on the >>> data you think we should send to the service will be slow

Re: 3.2: gjs/seed

2011-04-21 Thread jose.ali...@gmail.com
Hi, On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > Hi, > > So speaking as someone who was motivated to make writing GNOME apps > easier, I'm not very happy with how things turned out with the mix of > gjs/seed/python/introspection/gtk3. > > In this mail I just want to focus on the gjs/s