On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:39:30AM +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
May I ask big the problem is? Splitting into subpages/hiding makes it
more difficult to find (I usually search using C-f as it is much faster
then determining in which it is in).
You really want to show all the modules which
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:54 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:39:30AM +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
May I ask big the problem is? Splitting into subpages/hiding makes it
more difficult to find (I usually search using C-f as it is much faster
then determining in which it
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 18:07 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:33:47AM +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
Checking the last commits of the modules on git.gnome.org, I noticed we
have 120 modules which
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:33:47AM +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
Checking the last commits of the modules on git.gnome.org, I noticed we
have 120 modules which haven't received a commit in the last 3 years.
I'll
On 05.04.2011 02:17, Olav Vitters wrote:
perl-GStreamer-GConf.git2006-01-29 21:02:29 + 5 years ago
perl-Gtk2-SourceView.git2006-01-30 08:44:31 + 5 years ago
While these may not have seen many updates recently, I don't think they
should be archived unless
Checking the last commits of the modules on git.gnome.org, I noticed we
have 120 modules which haven't received a commit in the last 3 years.
I'll archive the modules somewhere this week (modules can easily be
moved out of the archive).
I've archived modules before when I was really sure that
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
Checking the last commits of the modules on git.gnome.org, I noticed we
have 120 modules which haven't received a commit in the last 3 years.
I'll archive the modules somewhere this week (modules can easily be
moved out of
