Shaun McCance wrote:
...
> It is worth looking into sharing solutions with other projects. But most
> projects seem to do what we've done: home-brew a solution that fits
> exactly their needs. Hard to share that.
In that case, I've got some mockups in the works for a new site:
https://github.com
I wrote:
> There are a few outstanding bugs (old development versions are pruned
> from the index files but not from the server, and are getting indexed by
> Google), [...]
That particular bug has now been fixed, old development versions are
now properly removed from the server; however I don't k
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:52 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Shaun McCance wrote:
> ...
> > RTD has been hugely popular in the Python world, but it's not the only
> > continuous deployment or automated docs build system out there. Red Hat
> > and Fedora use Publican for almost everything. ...
>
> The Re
Shaun McCance wrote:
...
> RTD has been hugely popular in the Python world, but it's not the only
> continuous deployment or automated docs build system out there. Red Hat
> and Fedora use Publican for almost everything. ...
The Red Hat Publican deployment seems fairly custom - it is pretty
nice,
> Frederic Peters wrote:
>> ... I'd prefer to have ideas on the structure we
>> want before we go looking for the appropriate software (or changes to
>> the library-web code base).
...
Thinking about this, if we are going to do something homebrew, then I
can I can come up with more detailed plans
Frederic Peters wrote:
...
>> RTD has been hugely popular in the Python world, but it's not the only
>> continuous deployment or automated docs build system out there. Red Hat
>> and Fedora use Publican for almost everything. OpenStack has a big pile
>> of Maven code that builds its site. There ar
Hi Shaun,
> How much maintenance burden is there for the general infrastructure of
> library-web, versus the burden of the various converters and such that
> we'd have to deal with anyway if plugging them into another system?
There's not much maintenance required, for example new modules are
auto
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:24 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Allan Day wrote:
>
> > One of the reasons why I wanted to have this conversation is to find
> > out if there are any third party solutions that we could use, rather
> > than having to write and maintain our own site from scratch? Is Read
Allan Day wrote:
> One of the reasons why I wanted to have this conversation is to find
> out if there are any third party solutions that we could use, rather
> than having to write and maintain our own site from scratch? Is Read
> the Docs [1] an option?
It's a first look from that perspective,
Frederic Peters wrote:
...
> I would tend to put goals before technical details, but library-web as
> it is nowadays is certainly not the best option; I addressed a few of
> the issues in my mail to gnome-doc-devel-list@. ...
>> * Hackability ...
>> * User experience ...
>> * Documentation w
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> While I'm sure a dynamic site would be a great idea in the far future, are
> there any small, actionable goals we can make for this?
As Fred already said, this list is probably the critical priority -
https://wiki.gnome.org/DocumentationProject/Tasks/DeveloperDocs#deve
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> While I'm sure a dynamic site would be a great idea in the far future, are
> there any small, actionable goals we can make for this?
>
> We all dream of a great docs scenario, but we never properly plan for it.
> What small wins can we get today, right now, to improve th
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 19:50 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> []
> No, I think the obstacle is that we don't have enough people willing
> to work on developer documentation over something else, even though
> many will recognize the importance it has. It's not new.
Touché.
--
Germán Poo-Caamaño
While I'm sure a dynamic site would be a great idea in the far future, are
there any small, actionable goals we can make for this?
We all dream of a great docs scenario, but we never properly plan for it.
What small wins can we get today, right now, to improve the experience? I
have some free time
Allan Day wrote:
> However, before we go down that route, it seems like we should at
> least discuss whether library-web is the best option going forward. It
I would tend to put goals before technical details, but library-web as
it is nowadays is certainly not the best option; I addressed a few o
Frederic Peters wrote:
...
> Since the hackfest in Norwich in January it's possible to get specific
> modules online (almost) directly after the git commits. It is
> configured that way for gnome-user-docs and gnome-getting-started-docs
> (for help. gnome.org) and for gnome-devel-docs (developer
16 matches
Mail list logo
