On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 15:11 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Makes sense to me, so let's just do it. Just decide on a version of
berkeley db ;-)
Done, updated:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven/ExternalDependencies
I was conservative and picked libdb 4.5.20 (released June 2006) as the
Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 15:11 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Makes sense to me, so let's just do it. Just decide on a version of
berkeley db ;-)
Done, updated:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven/ExternalDependencies
I was conservative and picked libdb 4.5.20
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009, à 11:13 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit :
For years now, evolution-data-server has been dragging around its own
copy of Berkeley DB (libdb) 4.1.25. As I understand the back story, it
was originally added to work around libdb's frequently changing on-disk
database
For years now, evolution-data-server has been dragging around its own
copy of Berkeley DB (libdb) 4.1.25. As I understand the back story, it
was originally added to work around libdb's frequently changing on-disk
database format at that time, which would break our local address book
databases
Evolution uses both Berkeley DB and SQLite, right? Is there any reason
you need to keep using two different database systems? Would it be
possible to just migrate everything to one of the two databases
instead of using them both?
- Martin
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:23 -0400, Martin Meyer wrote:
Evolution uses both Berkeley DB and SQLite, right? Is there any reason
you need to keep using two different database systems? Would it be
possible to just migrate everything to one of the two databases
instead of using them both?
I
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:13 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
For years now, evolution-data-server has been dragging around its own
copy of Berkeley DB (libdb) 4.1.25. As I understand the back story, it
was originally added to work around libdb's frequently changing on-disk
database format at that
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 19:15 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
At Archlinux, we've been linking it dynamic since this blog post was
made. We have a db4.1 package for this, to keep compatibility with
evolution binaries that use the shipped binaries. We would be happy to
drop this db4.1 package and just
In Solaris Nevada, (Not OpenSolaris), we are using 4.7.25. I think 4.8
should also work.
Jeff
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:13 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
For years now, evolution-data-server has been dragging around its own
copy of Berkeley DB (libdb) 4.1.25. As I understand the back story, it
