According to our rules only maintainers can propose their modules, but I
assume that Jürg is more than okay with desrt's proposal as he did not
answer with a No way! to this thread. ;-)
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Andre Klapper wrote:
According to our rules only maintainers can propose their modules
Even for external dependencies?
Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Am Freitag, den 16.10.2009, 02:25 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
Andre Klapper wrote:
According to our rules only maintainers can propose their modules
Even for external dependencies?
Ah. Very good point.
I should not try to catch up with 500 emails late at night.
andre
--
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:11 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
I would rephrase this as valac as a build dependency for gnome
as valac is like yacc/bison/flex in that there is no runtime dependency
and only people developing
On 12/10/09 16:10, Ryan Lortie wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
2.30.
Some GNOME modules are already using Vala, but they are placing
generated .c/.h files into version control to avoid the need for other
contributors to have Vala
Hi
I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
2.30.
Some GNOME modules are already using Vala, but they are placing
generated .c/.h files into version control to avoid the need for other
contributors to have Vala installed. That's just ugly. :(
Using Vala to compile
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
2.30.
[...]
This is therefore a 'special' external dependency: it would only be
required when building from git (or hacking on the code).
It makes sense that we
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jürg Billeter j...@bitron.ch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
2.30.
[...]
This is therefore a 'special' external dependency: it would only be
required when
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:35 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
2.30.
[...]
This is therefore a 'special' external dependency: it would only be
required when
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 18:43 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jürg Billeter j...@bitron.ch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
2.30.
[...]
This is
I would rephrase this as valac as a build dependency for gnome
as valac is like yacc/bison/flex in that there is no runtime dependency
and only people developing or compiling from git will need it (tarballs
and distributed source will contain the generated c files so wont be
needed there)
jamie
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:11 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
I would rephrase this as valac as a build dependency for gnome
as valac is like yacc/bison/flex in that there is no runtime dependency
and only people developing or compiling from git will need it (tarballs
and distributed source will
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:52 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:11 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
I would rephrase this as valac as a build dependency for gnome
as valac is like yacc/bison/flex in that there is no runtime dependency
and only people developing or
13 matches
Mail list logo
