Hi,
To integrate this feature properly in Gnome and make users feels like
it's truly a part of it, I feel like the application would need to be
split in several UI components connected in the right places in the
Gnome UI and a service which would read to the webcam and do the head
tracking.
Hi,
I think that this raises an important point about inclusion of
accessibility features: they are often very innovative, and they enhance
the experiences of average users. For example, the on-screen keyboard
can be adapted for use on touch-screen devices (at least this is my
understanding
Hi,
I think that this raises an important point about inclusion of
accessibility features: they are often very innovative, and they enhance
the experiences of average users. For example, the on-screen keyboard
can be adapted for use on touch-screen devices (at least this is my
Hi,
I think we are missing the important bit here.
Tracking your head with a webcam to drive a mouse results in a bad
experience. It doesn't work even remotely well.
Some users already find this feature/application really useful.
Someone will, in the future, figure out how to do this
On 10/25/2011 03:56 PM, Jan Jokela wrote:
I think we are missing the important bit here.
Tracking your head with a webcam to drive a mouse results in a bad
experience. It doesn't work even remotely well.
Some users already find this feature/application really useful.
Someone will, in the
Hi,
The application provides that UI (here [1][2] for some screenshots) in
order to:
* Configure the application (on the screenshot the Configuration dialog)
I am not a designer but I would somehow wonder if they would consider
this a good user-interface design.
Those screenshots are
To give my 2cents and recenter the discussion a bit since I think it
would be a nice feature to have in Gnome3 (but keep in mind that's
just my opinion from informations I gleaned from the eViacam website
and that I'm not volunteering to do any works on this)
As I see it right now the problem is
Hi!
The application provides that UI (here [1][2] for some screenshots) in
order to:
* Configure the application (on the screenshot the Configuration dialog)
I am not a designer but I would somehow wonder if they would consider
this a good user-interface design.
* A main window showing
On 10/21/2011 06:28 PM, Piñeiro wrote:
Description
===
Some physically impaired users are not able to use the mouse, so an
alternative input system is required. web-cams are a really common and
cheap device these days (most of modern laptops include it), so one
option is use a webcam to
2011/10/22 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 21 October 2011 17:28, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
* Look and feel: some people could not agree with current interface
[2]. This shouldn't be a blocker thought.
This feature proposal would include the proposal of wxWidgets
as a
On 21 October 2011 17:28, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
* Repositories: right now it is on sourceforge. This shouldn't be a
blocker thought.
I'm pretty sure it needs to be on git.gnome.org
* Look and feel: some people could not agree with current interface
[2]. This shouldn't be a
- Mensaje original -
De: Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
Para: Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com
CC: Cesar Mauri ce...@crea-si.com; desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Enviado: sábado 22 de octubre de 2011 11:47
Asunto: Re: Feature proposal: Alternative input system based on low-cost
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
And finally, the main concern could be about the graphical toolkit.
eViacam uses wxWidgets [3][4], in order to ensure a native look and feel
on both Windows and Linux systems. wxGTK is the most common wxWidgets
port,
Description
===
Some physically impaired users are not able to use the mouse, so an
alternative input system is required. web-cams are a really common and
cheap device these days (most of modern laptops include it), so one
option is use a webcam to track the motion of any object visible by
14 matches
Mail list logo
