all.
As John said on his blog, there were efforts for some better GNOME/Win32
experience and I was envolved in one of them. In my opinion GNOME and
its libraries should be as easily deployed on Win32 or Mac OS X as they
are on, say, Ubuntu.
I'd like to concentrate on success stories and blockers
Hello Piotr,
Win32 world. Libxml2 or GIMP being the cases. Still I'd love to use
Tomboy, Empathy, Epiphany and Rhythmbox native and with plugins in
Win32 environment.
I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, but I do want to
point out that Epiphany is designed to be an integrated
Dnia 11-12-2007, Wt o godzinie 17:05 +0100, Reinout van Schouwen pisze:
Hello Piotr,
Win32 world. Libxml2 or GIMP being the cases. Still I'd love to use
Tomboy, Empathy, Epiphany and Rhythmbox native and with plugins in
Win32 environment.
I don't necessarily disagree with what you're
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:38 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:30 +0100, Piotr Gaczkowski wrote:
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I don't want it working outside the GNOME
environment, but working in the GNOME environment on Win32/OS X
platform. Modular GNOME is the wat to do
Hi,
Piotr Gaczkowski wrote:
For me it is certainly a point worth achieveing, especially now, for we
have more and more interest in free OSes as well as we are dropping the
dependencies on pure UNIX thingies (dbus, dconf, pulseaudio). What's
your opinion?
I'd consider dbus and dconf steps
