Just a quickie since the kids are screaming :-) : I started a wiki page to
collect the status of this discussion: http://live.gnome.org/EasyGnome
If I missed anything please comment. Heck please comment anyways.
Cheers,
Mikkel
___
desktop-devel-list
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 00:43 +0100, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
[snip]
we need some proper documentation
explaining how the GNOME stack is built,
jhbuild should take care of building. There is a lot of information
about how to use jhbuild, including solving specific problems on
specific distros.
On 10/11/2007, Matteo Settenvini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno ven, 09/11/2007 alle 16.58 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma ha scritto:
On 11/9/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Are the current drawbacks of using autotools in GNOME so so so
annoying that it would be really worth the
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
knowledge of C# or Java
you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
native C# and Java applications.
* Autotools are exceptionally hard
On Nov 10, 2007 7:41 AM, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
knowledge of C# or Java
you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
On 10/11/2007, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
knowledge of C# or Java
you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
native C#
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 14:41 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
knowledge of C# or Java
you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
On Nov 9, 2007 11:43 PM, Matteo Settenvini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to discuss with you where we could act seriously in this
direction. I've got some comments to make:
It sounds like at this stage some input from people who have found the
learning curve prohibitive might be
hi;
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 23:33 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
On 10/11/2007, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
wrote:
* GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 00:37 +, Who wrote:
[snip]
Here are my thoughts:
1. What do you use to code!? What do I need on my system to do
this?--
Coding on Windows makes you soft, especially if you used something
like Visual Studio. There will be a huge number of
Il giorno ven, 09/11/2007 alle 16.58 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma ha scritto:
On 11/9/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Are the current drawbacks of using autotools in GNOME so so so
annoying that it would be really worth the effort of migrating to
something else?
The only reason I
11 matches
Mail list logo