On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:23 +, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 08:33 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2010/12/11 Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Basically, I want us to be decoupled from this; there are
2010/12/13 Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com:
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:23 +, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 08:33 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2010/12/11 Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Basically, I want us
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hey,
Comments from people creating operating systems derived from GNOME
would be appreciated here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636977
Basically, I'd like a gnome-spidermonkey package which uses *exactly*
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 16:20 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
We need a smallish amount of code. The complete Firefox build
in the jhbuild takes a long time.
Don't build FF in jhbuild, use the one provided by your distribution.
A) FF in your distribution might provide one of two very
El lun, 13-12-2010 a las 16:25 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki escribió:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hey,
Comments from people creating operating systems derived from GNOME
would be appreciated here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636977
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 08:33 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2010/12/11 Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Basically, I want us to be decoupled from this; there are conceptually
actually 4 layers.
NSPR - spidermonkey - xulrunner
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
Isn't that what xulrunner package is for ?
xulrunner *is* firefox, literally; the sources are identical. On
Fedora at least, Firefox is built using it, which means that if
there's say a security update for Firefox (which
2010/12/10 Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
Isn't that what xulrunner package is for ?
xulrunner *is* firefox, literally; the sources are identical. On
Fedora at least, Firefox is built using it, which means that if
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
Except almost nobody ship spidermonkey that way (I used to package it
separately years ago in Mandrake) but it didn't last long and there
was very few (ie one or two) using it and no maintenance on it by
upstream.
2010/12/10 Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net wrote:
Except almost nobody ship spidermonkey that way (I used to package it
separately years ago in Mandrake) but it didn't last long and there
was very few (ie one or two) using it
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Basically, I want us to be decoupled from this; there are conceptually
actually 4 layers.
NSPR - spidermonkey - xulrunner - firefox
Where - is depends on. Right now at least Fedora ships like:
NSPR - (spidermonkey xulrunner
2010/12/11 Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Basically, I want us to be decoupled from this; there are conceptually
actually 4 layers.
NSPR - spidermonkey - xulrunner - firefox
Where - is depends on. Right now at least Fedora
12 matches
Mail list logo
