Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2020-09-14 Thread Olav Vitters
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:14:15PM +0100, Kevin Degeling wrote: ps. First time ever on a mailing list, so please let me know if I'm way to formal or if I make a very Dutch impression. As far as I know, there's nothing wrong with making a very Dutch impression! -- Regards, Olav

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2020-09-10 Thread Link Dupont
Good point. I'll see about making a release tarball for it. I'd be happy to maintain the flathub repository too, yea. On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:05 pm, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote: I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2020-09-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote: > I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of > software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on > maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this > sounds > like a great opportunity to

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-04 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Thanks, Link! I see you already have GNOME developer access, so you can go ahead and add yourself to the doap file. I agree with Bastien that setting up CI should be priority #1. Michael ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote: > I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of > software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on > maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this > sounds > like a great opportunity to

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 23:14 +0100, Kevin Degeling wrote: > Hey All, > > After reporting an issue related to Sound Juicer, I discovered that > the project has been mostly abandoned. There is still a valuable pull > request open ( > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sound-juicer/merge_requests/2) but

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Link Dupont
I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this sounds like a great opportunity to become one. Link On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:09 am, Luis Menina

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Luis Menina
Le 03/12/2019 à 23:52, Raphaël Jacquot a écrit : Le 03/12/2019 à 23:28, Sasa Ostrouska via desktop-devel-list a écrit : Hi, yeah I think that the problem today is that cd rip and burning for music is a bit outdated, probably would be better to transform it to a phone transfer music app or a

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Raphaël Jacquot
Le 03/12/2019 à 23:28, Sasa Ostrouska via desktop-devel-list a écrit : > Hi, yeah I think that the problem today is that cd rip and burning for > music is a bit outdated, probably would be better to transform it to a > phone transfer > music app or a burning to USB one. YOu know what I mean,

Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Sasa Ostrouska via desktop-devel-list
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:14 PM Kevin Degeling wrote: > > Hey All, > > After reporting an issue related to Sound Juicer, I discovered that the > project has been mostly abandoned. There is still a valuable pull request > open (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sound-juicer/merge_requests/2) but

Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Kevin Degeling
Hey All, After reporting an issue related to Sound Juicer, I discovered that the project has been mostly abandoned. There is still a valuable pull request open ( https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sound-juicer/merge_requests/2) but for the most part active maintainance has stopped. This puts the