Re: Tomboy in 2.16 (lets get this over with) (from digest)

2006-04-22 Thread Murray Cumming
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 10:23 +0200, David Neary wrote: > > Elijah Newren wrote: > > 1. gtk-sharp isn't (yet) in the bindings set (and I haven't seen it > > proposed by its maintainer(s)) > > 2. gtk-sharp isn't yet a blessed binding dependency (only python is so > > far; though there doesn't seem to

Re: Tomboy in 2.16 (lets get this over with) (from digest)

2006-04-22 Thread David Neary
Elijah Newren wrote: > 1. gtk-sharp isn't (yet) in the bindings set (and I haven't seen it > proposed by its maintainer(s)) > 2. gtk-sharp isn't yet a blessed binding dependency (only python is so > far; though there doesn't seem to be any objection so far so this one > looks pretty good if 1 goe