On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 07:48 +0100, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 11:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 12:58 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2007/12/3, Nicolas Trangez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Does anyone has done this mkenum thing with waf already?
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2007/12/2, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100%
WAF-ied
On Dec 3, 2007 2:27 PM, Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is going to be a pain for distributions to learn yet another build
systems, which might need patching to fix one or another bug.
The Debian Developer(s) responsible for the XMMS2 packages haven't had
much (if any) trubble with
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:37 +0100, Daniel Svensson wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by lack of crosscompiling support.
Crosscompiling needs very little.
1. A compiler that runs on your host OS, and produces output for some
target OS/arch.
2. A set of dependencies (if any) built for that
On Dec 3, 2007 3:51 PM, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
autoconf has standard support for running tests on the local machine for
example to determine the word size, if the networking layer supports
abstract sockets, and so on. If the build is being cross-compiled these
tests fail
On Dec 3, 2007 2:21 PM, Nicolas Trangez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need to write up on this, no time now though, sorry. One of the primary
reasons is the lack of crosscompiling support.
I'm not sure what you mean by lack of crosscompiling support.
Crosscompiling needs very little.
1. A compiler
On Dec 3, 2007 4:03 PM, Daniel Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2007 3:51 PM, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
autoconf has standard support for running tests on the local machine for
example to determine the word size, if the networking layer supports
Ah, ofc runtime checks.
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:15 +0100, Daniel Svensson wrote:
On Dec 3, 2007 4:03 PM, Daniel Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2007 3:51 PM, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
autoconf has standard support for running tests on the local machine for
example to determine the word
On Dec 3, 2007 6:30 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I honestly don't see the point of supporting runtime tests with cross
compilation in the build tool. I mean, the most that the tool can do is
give an error message saying the test cannot be run. How will that
help?
On 02/12/2007, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
all you
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 09:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Jaap, I am well aware of this, but I am not committing a WAF script to
each project repository is the best way to go. Each script is 100KB
semi-binary file. Every time I update WAF I would need to essentially
add 100KB to the
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
all you need to build) is 249K, while an autotools version is 424K. I
could
2007/12/2, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
all you need to
On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
On Dec 2, 2007 5:07 PM, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 16:55 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Ooh, I'd love to see timing numbers. The size differences are pretty
impressive; it would likely make a noticable impact on times for
building releases for garnome users,
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 16:55 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Ooh, I'd love to see timing numbers. The size differences are pretty
impressive; it would likely make a noticable impact on times for
building releases for garnome users, release team members, and others.
Time I don't think as
On Dec 2, 2007 11:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
18 matches
Mail list logo
