On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 22:45 +1300, John Stowers wrote:
In the specific case of RB, Gossip and Evolution, it seems that people
want to prettify treeviews for this kind of thing, assigning specific
visual style to elements that hold different meaning (e.g. first level
heading, second level
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Horkan
As much as I applaud any effort to depart from uninspired default
styling, if we want visual wow, we should try to make it happen in a
consistent fashion, and then maybe we can make it
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:27:50 +0100
From: Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Weird and wonderful visual styling of applications
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 01:23 +, Alex
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 01:23 +, Alex Jones wrote:
As much as I applaud any effort to depart from uninspired default
styling, if we want visual wow, we should try to make it happen in a
consistent fashion, and then maybe we can make it look even better!
I hope you don't mean everyone should
In the specific case of RB, Gossip and Evolution, it seems that people
want to prettify treeviews for this kind of thing, assigning specific
visual style to elements that hold different meaning (e.g. first level
heading, second level heading, etc.). Perhaps we should come up with a
way to do
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 01:23 +, Alex Jones wrote:
Hi list
(Disclaimer: I'm completely clueless, so all of this may well be
bullshit - put me right!)
I've noticed that more and more apps are departing from stock styling
and implementing some more adventurous visual appearances,
Hi list
(Disclaimer: I'm completely clueless, so all of this may well be
bullshit - put me right!)
I've noticed that more and more apps are departing from stock styling
and implementing some more adventurous visual appearances,
particularly when it comes to tree views. See the new tree view in
