On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 18:09 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
I think his objections were
2011/8/20 Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 06:46:15PM +0200, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
Still, if bug #123456 is more voted than bug #654321, it may be worth
dedicating some more design hours to the former than to the latter,
investigating the reasons, providing evidence,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
I never found the time to do a proper write up of the user testing I
did on the shell. It was brief and ad hoc; I can tell you that the
five participants in my study were all able to complete the tasks that
were set for them
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
I never found the time to do a proper write up of the user testing I
did on the shell. It was brief and ad hoc; I can tell you that the
five participants in my study were all able to complete the tasks that
were set for them
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
I never found the time to do a proper write up of the user testing I
did on the shell. It was brief and ad hoc; I can tell you that the
five participants in my study were all
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:28:54PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
So, no data there.
There's no data there.
No data there either.
I have read that whole thread; there's no data there either, just
about of explanations that can be reduced to; it's sleek.
No data here either.
Here's some
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:38:55PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:28:54PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
So, no data there.
There's no data there.
No data there either.
I have read that whole thread; there's no data there either, just
about of explanations
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:43:28PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
I think his objections were justified. There is really no raw data
at those URLs.
My problem is not with objections. It is about the way of expressing
those objections.
--
Regards,
Olav
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 12.04 +0100, Allan Day ha scritto:
Hey Giovanni,
I'm being selective in my responses here...
Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry I couldn't read through the whole GNOME Survey v4 thread, but
it was just too long. What I read though
On 20 August 2011 14:18, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Or we could have voting in bugzilla. I know many people are against to
this, but it would immediately show the hottest issue, that surely
require reconsideration by the design team.
No. It would only tell you that a
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:38:55PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:28:54PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
So, no data there.
There's no data there.
No data there either.
I have read that whole
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
I think his objections were justified. There is really no raw data
at those URLs.
Except Allan never claimed he was providing raw data. In fact,
he explicitly said
More selective answers... :)
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 12.04 +0100, Allan Day ha scritto:
This is the first time I see the amount of users tested, and the exact
tasks involved. I think it should go
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 11.02 -0400, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:38:55PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:28:54PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
So, no data there.
There's
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 15.48 +0100, Rui Tiago Cação Matos ha
scritto:
On 20 August 2011 14:18, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Or we could have voting in bugzilla. I know many people are against to
this, but it would immediately show the hottest issue, that surely
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 16.50 +0100, Allan Day ha scritto:
[...]
Where we developers can find hard facts proving the NOTABUG and the
WONTFIX we mark in the most questioned and hot issues?
You can always mark a bug with the ui-review keyword if you want a
second opinion.
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 18:09 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
I think his objections were justified. There is really no raw data
at those URLs.
Except Allan
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 06:46:15PM +0200, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
Still, if bug #123456 is more voted than bug #654321, it may be worth
dedicating some more design hours to the former than to the latter,
investigating the reasons, providing evidence, doing tests, etc.
Then, maybe the bug will
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 18:42 +0200, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 11.02 -0400, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
I also do user tests when working on the help. I also don't do
write-ups. I fix problems or I pass information on to those who
are in a position to fix the
I'm sorry I couldn't read through the whole GNOME Survey v4 thread, but
it was just too long. What I read though is that data was collected and
extists.
Now I'd like to simply ask: where is it?
Where we developers can find real cold numbers backing out the designs
we're asked to implement?
Where
On 19 August 2011 19:00, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
As a specific example of unscientific user testing, I got a friend of
mine to try GNOME 3 at the desktop summit, and when it was time to
shutdown he just asked me, because he found no way and he thought it was
a bug.
21 matches
Mail list logo
